Who Were the Mawālī?: Identity, Power, and Belonging in the First Islamic Century

Who Were the Mawālī?: Identity, Power, and Belonging in the First Islamic Century

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ 

"In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful."

In the study of early Islamic history, few terms generate more confusion—and more misunderstanding—than mawlā (pl. mawālī). Today, the word is often reduced in popular discussions to one meaning: “non-Arab Muslim.” But the real history of the mawālī is far older, richer, and more complicated than this simple definition allows. To understand who the mawālī were in the first centuries of Islam, we must journey back into the tribal world of Jāhiliyyah, where mawlā described a relationship, not an ethnicity; a bond, not a class.

In pre-Islamic Arabia, a mawlā could be a freed slave, a loyal ally, an adopted tribesman, or a protected client. The term reflected a spectrum of social dependencies that structured tribal life. Mawālī could rise to prominence through loyalty, poetry, or martial skill—but their status always depended on their attachment to a tribe. It was a system grounded in reciprocity: protection in exchange for loyalty, belonging in exchange for service. The concept was fluid, but always relational.

When Islam emerged, it did not erase this world—it transformed it.

During the Prophet’s ﷺ lifetime and the Rashidun era, the mawlā became an integral part of the new community. Conversion did not automatically grant a non-Arab a tribe, but it did open a path to belonging: one joined a Muslim tribe through walā’, the bond of patronage, creating a new form of social membership in a rapidly expanding ummah. Thousands of Persians, Aramaeans, Copts, Berbers, and others entered Islam through this framework—not as conquered subjects forced to assimilate, but as new Muslims navigating the realities of tribal society.

By the Umayyad period, however, the mawālī stood at the center of profound political, social, and religious tensions. Though many were scholars, soldiers, administrators, and converts of deep sincerity, they were often treated as second-tier members of the Muslim community—excluded from full economic privileges, taxed unfairly, or marginalized by Arab elites seeking to preserve their dominance. Discontent simmered, and the mawālī became both a symbol and a force in the great upheavals that reshaped the empire.

With the rise of the Abbasids in 750 CE, the story of the mawālī reached a dramatic turning point. Their support was essential to the revolution that toppled the Umayyads, and their status was elevated in ways unthinkable a century earlier. Iranian converts, once clients of Arab tribes, now shaped the very heart of the caliphal court. Bureaucracy, scholarship, literature, and government administration increasingly reflected cultures and talents that had once stood outside Arabia. The mawlā—once a dependent—became a pillar of a truly cosmopolitan Islamic civilization.

This blog post will explore the evolution of the mawālī in all its complexity:

• 🏺 Jāhiliyyah: Walā’ as tribal attachment and dependency

• 🌙 Prophetic & Rashidun Era: The transformation of walā’ into a mechanism of inclusion

• ⚔️ Umayyad Rule: Tensions, inequality, resistance, and the politicization of the mawālī

• 🏛️ Abbasid Age: Empowerment, integration, and the birth of a multicultural Islamic empire

• 📚 Society & Law: How courts, scholars, and jurists navigated mawlā identity

• 🧬 Identity & Belonging: How non-Arab Muslims negotiated their place in a tribalized empire

In tracing this journey, we will disentangle myths from reality, show how identity was negotiated—not imposed—and reveal how the mawālī helped shape early Islam from within, not from the margins. Their story is not simply one of subordination or struggle; it is also one of transformation, creativity, and the making of an Islamic civilization that belonged to far more than the Arabs alone.

🏺 Section I: The Root of It All – Deconstructing "Wali"

To understand the mawālī, we must first understand the root from which their name springs: W-L-Y (و ل ي). This trilateral root is a semantic universe in itself, generating a constellation of meanings that all revolve around a core concept: proximity, succession, and the relationship that binds them.

The medieval lexicographer Ibn Manzur (d. 1311 CE), in his monumental dictionary Lisān al-'Arab (The Tongue of the Arabs), dedicates pages to this root. His entry isn't just a definition; it's a map of the Arab socio-linguistic imagination. The term mawlā (derived from this root) is not a simple label but a relational nexus, a point where authority, protection, kinship, and allegiance converge.

Let's break down this complex web of meanings.

🔍 Semantic Analysis of W-L-Y: The Core Idea of "Proximity & Connection"

At its heart, W-L-Y conveys the idea of being near, adjacent, or next in sequence. From this physical and temporal proximity springs a world of social, political, and religious relationships. The following table categorizes the primary meanings that branch out from this core.

Primary Meaning	Key Derivatives & Meanings	Example Usage & Context
🤝 To Be Near / To Follow In Sequence	وَلِيَ (waliya): To be near, to be adjacent. تَوَالَى (tawālā): To follow in succession, to be consecutive. وَلِيّ (waliyy): Something that is near or close.	"A month following another" (تَوَالَى الشَّهْرَان). "A nearby house" (دَارٌ وَلِيَّة).
🛡️ To Administer / To Govern	وَلِيَ الأَمْرَ (waliya al-amra): To manage an affair. وِلايَة / وِلَايَة (wilāyah/walāyah): Administration, governance, authority. وَالٍ (wālin): Governor, one in charge.	The وَالِي (wālī) of a province. The وِلايَة (wilāyah) of a leader.
❤️ To Be a Friend / Ally	وَلِيّ (waliyy): Friend, helper, supporter. وِلايَة (wilāyah): Friendship, alliance. تَوَلَّى (tawallā): To take as a friend/ally.	"God is the وَلِيّ (Protector) of the believers." (Quran). Forming an alliance (وِلايَة).
👨‍👦 To Be a Kinsman / Guardian	وَلِيّ (waliyy): Legal guardian (e.g., of an orphan, a woman in marriage). أَوْلَى (awlā): Closer/more deserving (in kinship).	The وَلِيّ of the orphan manages their wealth. A woman's وَلِيّ consents to her marriage.
🔁 To Turn Towards / Away	وَلَّى (wallā): To turn towards (or away). تَوَلَّى (tawallā): To turn away, to forsake. إِسْتِدْبَار (istidbār): Turning one's back (a related concept).	"Then you turned away (ثُمَّ وَلَّيْتُمْ) fleeing." (Quran). تَوَلَّى about the enemy retreating.
⚖️ Patron-Client Relationship (Walā')	مَوْلَى (mawlā): Patron, client, freed slave, ally. وَلاء (walā’): The bond of patronage/clientship. تَوَلِّي (tawallī): The act of entering a client relationship.	"The clientage (الْوَلاء) belongs to the one who manumits." (Hadith). A freed slave is the مَوْلَى of his former master.

➡️ The Conceptual Bridge: From "Proximity" to "Relationship"

How do we get from "being near" to all these complex social roles? The progression is logical and deeply rooted in a tribal society:

1. Physical Proximity (وَلِيَ): You are near someone geographically.

2. Sequential Proximity (تَوَالَى): You come after them, following in their footsteps.

3. Relational Proximity: This closeness creates a bond. You become their neighbor (جَار), which is a sacred relationship.

4. Functional Proximity: From this bond flows responsibility. You manage their affairs (وَلِيَ أَمْرَهُمْ) if they cannot, becoming their guardian (وَلِيّ).

5. Affectional Proximity: Management and care foster loyalty. You become their friend and ally (وَلِيّ نَاصِر).

6. Legal-Institutional Proximity: This entire chain of proximity is formalized into the bond of walā’ (وَلاء), making you their mawlā (مَوْلَى)—whether as a patron, a client, or a freedman integrated into a new tribal structure.

🤯 The Ultimate Paradox: Mawlā as a Contronym

The most fascinating consequence of this semantic range is that the word مَوْلَى (mawlā) can mean two opposite things, depending on context. It is a classic contronym (a word with two opposing meanings).

If you are the Mawlā, you can be:
👉 THE PATRON • The Master who manumits a slave. • The Lord (God as المَوْلَى). • The Protector and Ally.
OR...
👈 THE CLIENT • The Freed Slave (مَوْلَى العِتْق). • The Convert under patronage (مَوْلَى الوَلاء). • The Allied tribesman (مَوْلَى الحِلْف).

This duality is perfectly captured in a verse by the poet al-Farazdaq, where he mocks a rival:

"If 'Abdullah were a mawlā I would insult him, but 'Abdullah is a mawlā of mawālī."

Here, the first mawlā implies a lowly client, while the second implies a powerful patron of clients. The word contains its own opposite, embodying the entire hierarchical relationship in a single term.

The root W-L-Y is not just a linguistic curiosity; it is the key that unlocks the social world of early Islam. The term mawlā was never primarily about ethnicity. It was about relationship.

It described a position within a network of obligations—a network defined by proximity, protection, loyalty, and authority. To be a mawlā was to be connected, for better or for worse. It was this fluid, powerful, and inherently relational concept that Islam inherited and transformed, using it to build bridges between the conquering Arabs and the vast world of new converts knocking at the door of the empire.

🏜️ Section II: The Tribal Crucible – Alliances and Outsiders in Pre-Islamic Arabia

To understand the revolutionary nature of early Islamic society, we must first journey into the world of Jahiliyah. This was not a lawless void but a society governed by a rigid, complex, and often brutal tribal system where identity, protection, and honor were determined by blood.

This section will explore the intricate social structures of pre-Islamic Arabia, focusing on the institutions of alliance (hilf) and clientage (walā'). Crucially, we will see how these institutions were living, breathing manifestations of the root W-L-Y, and how the early Islamic community both challenged and absorbed these ancient customs.

🏛️ 1. The Bedrock of Society: The Tribal Structure (Al-‘Aṣabiyyah)

Imagine a world where the individual was nothing without the group. This was the reality of pre-Islamic Arabia.

The Nucleus: The Descent Group (Al-Qawm)

-

Society was organized into nested circles of real or fictitious descent groups (qabīlah, batn, fak̲h̲d̲h). Your lineage (nasab) was your passport, your social security, and your legal defense. The tribe was a "super-body," and its members were its "souls" or "essence"—the anfus (نَفْس, pl. anfus or nufūs), a term we saw in Ibn Manzur meaning "the self" but also, pivotally, the full, blood-born members of the tribe.

The Guiding Principle: Al-‘Aṣabiyyah (Group Solidarity)

-

This was the supreme virtue. The famous pre-Islamic maxim was: "انْصُرْ أَخَاكَ ظَالِمًا أَوْ مَظْلُومًا" — "Help your brother, whether he is the oppressor or the oppressed." 🛡️ ➡️ 🛡️

While later Islamic teachings would refine this, in Jahiliyah, it meant unwavering loyalty to your tribe, right or wrong. Your tribe was your only guarantee of protection, vengeance (tha'r), and survival.

🤝 2. Alliances (Al-H̲ilf): The Art of Tribal Diplomacy

But what if your tribe was small or vulnerable? This is where alliances came in. Alliances (h̲ilf, pl. aḥlāf or h̲ulūf) were formal treaties. The very word h̲ilf comes from the root H̲-L-F, meaning "to swear an oath" or "to take a solemn pledge," often at a sacred site like the Ka'bah.

Scholars like Ella Landau-Tasseron identify several types, but two are crucial for our story:

Type of Alliance	Description	Example
A. Political/Military Alliances	Treaties for specific purposes—a joint raid (g̲hazw) or defense against a rival. The parties remained distinct.	🤝 H̲ilf al-Fuḍūl: Qurayshi clans allied to protect merchants. The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ later praised it, saying he would honor it even in Islam.
B. "Hosting Alliances" (H̲ilf al-Ijārah)	The Gateway to the Mawālī. A weaker group ("guest allies") attached to a powerful one ("host allies"). This is where W-L-Y comes to life.	A small clan like Banū l-Muṣṭaliq becoming allies of the larger Khuza'ah.

The Deal & Its Consequences:

The host tribe offered protection (d̲himma) and integration. In return, the guest tribe pledged loyalty, military support, and shared liability.

• 👥 Shared Liability: The host tribe was responsible for paying blood money (diyya) for their allies.

• ⚔️ Blood Revenge: They fought together. "الدَّم الدَّم، والهَدْم الهَدْم" — "Blood for blood, destruction for destruction."

• 📜 Adoption of Nisba: The guest allies would often take the tribal name of their hosts, signaling incorporation.

• 💰 Inheritance: Allies could sometimes inherit from one another in the absence of direct male heirs.

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 3. The Mawlā: Where W-L-Y Meets Social Reality

Now we arrive at our key term. In this pre-Islamic context, the mawlā (pl. mawālī) was an individual client attached to a tribe through a bond of walā'. This is the institutionalization of the semantic field we explored with Ibn Manzur.

Let's map the meanings of W-L-Y directly onto the social roles:

Meaning from W-L-Y	Social Manifestation in Pre-Islam	Explanation
🤝 To Be Near / Adjacent	Physical & Social Proximity	The mawlā lived near the tribe, was adjacent to its social body, but not of its anfus (core).
🛡️ To Administer / Govern	The Patron's Role	The patron was the mawlā as administrator and guardian (wālī) of the client's affairs and protection.
❤️ To Be a Friend / Ally	The Bond of Loyalty	The relationship was ideally one of mutual wilāyah (friendship, support), though unequal.
👨‍👦 To Be a Kinsman/Guardian	Fictive Kinship	The mawlā was treated "like" kin. The patron was the walī (legal guardian) of the client.
🔁 To Turn Towards	The Act of Affiliation	The client tawallā (turned towards) the patron for support.

Who Became a Mawlā?

1. Freed Slaves (‘Itq): The most common origin. Manumission didn't mean being cast adrift. The freed slave became the mawlā of their former master or his tribe. This was a social safety net and a way to maintain a relationship of patronage and loyalty. This was called walā' al-‘itāq (clientage of manumission).

2. Individuals Seeking Protection: A lone individual (d̲a'īf, "weak") without tribal protection could seek an alliance, becoming a mawlā to gain security.

3. Whole Groups: Smaller clans could collectively become mawālī of a larger tribe.

The Status of the Pre-Islamic Mawlā: A Double-Edged Sword ⚔️

Positive Aspects (The "Upside") 👍	Negative Aspects (The "Downside") 👎
✅ Protection & Security: The patron tribe was your shield. You were now "in their wilāyah."	❌ Second-Class Status: A mawlā was never an equal to a born tribesman (‘aṣabī). Their honor (sharaf) was inherently lower.
✅ Social Integration: You were "under the wilāyah" of the tribe, with a defined place.	❌ Limited Autonomy: Your destiny was tied to your patrons. You fought their wars and were bound by their decisions.
✅ Legal Identity: You were part of a collective for blood money and legal matters.	❌ Stigma of Origin: Whether a freed slave or an outsider, you carried the mark of not being of the tribe's anfus (core souls).

🔄 The Crucial Confusion: H̲alīf vs. Mawlā

This is where the semantic richness of W-L-Y creates social complexity.

Term	Typical Meaning & Connotation
H̲alīf (pl. ḥulafā’)	Usually a free Arab who made an alliance (ḥilf). Their status was generally higher, implying a treaty between more equal parties.
Mawlā (pl. mawālī)	A broader term often carrying a lower connotation, especially when referring to freed slaves (walā' al-‘itāq).

However, the lines were blurry! As Landau-Tasseron emphasizes, the terms and institutions were "partly converging." A ḥalīf could be called a mawlā, and a mawlā could be described with the language of alliance. Why?

Because both relationships were expressions of W-L-Y. Both involved "turning towards" (tawallā), "alliance" (wilāyah), and being "near" (waliy). This confusion was not a bug but a feature of a flexible tribal system, and it would become a major point of legal and social debate in the Islamic period.

🎭 The Stage Was Set: The Prophet's Dilemma

When Islam emerged, it did not arrive in a vacuum. It confronted this deeply entrenched system. The Prophet's mission was to plant a new ideology in this unforgiving soil.

• The Radical Challenge: The core Islamic message was a direct assault on the Jāhili axioms. The declaration, "لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى" ("No superiority for an Arab over a non-Arab except by piety"), was revolutionary. It sought to dismantle the entire pyramid of blood-based status.

• The Pragmatic Tool: However, to build his new community (Ummah), the Prophet ﷺ could not simply ignore the only social system that existed. He pragmatically adopted and transformed its core integrative mechanism: Walā'.

Foreshadowing the Prophet's Strategy:

1. He used the existing language of alliance. The "Constitution of Medina" was essentially a Hilf, a treaty between the Muhajirun, Ansar, and Jewish tribes, creating a new supra-tribal polity based on faith, not blood.

2. He used the existing institution of Walā'. When a slave was freed or a non-Arab converted, they entered the community as a Mawlā of an individual or a tribe. This provided them with an immediate social identity and protection network within the familiar tribal framework.

3. He began to subvert it from within. By making piety the new nasab and the Ummah the new tribe, he started a process that would, over time, hollow out the old Jāhili values and fill the structure of Walā' with a new, Islamic spirit.

This tension between revolutionary ideals and pragmatic social engineering is the crucible in which the early Muslim community was forged. It is this very tension that defines the complex, painful, and ultimately transformative story of the Mawālī, who found themselves caught between the old world's prejudices and the new world's promise.

🌙 Section III: The Muhammadan Revolution – Reforging Society in the Fire of Faith

The world the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ inherited was, as we have seen, a pyramid of tribal bloodlines. But his mission was not to conquer this pyramid from the top; it was to dissolve its very foundations and build a new structure on the bedrock of faith. He did not merely preach a new theology; he engineered a comprehensive social revolution. At the heart of this revolution was a radical redefinition of the bonds that hold a society together, masterfully repurposing the existing concept of Walā'.

Elizabeth Urban’s analysis of the Quran is crucial here. She argues that the Quranic term mawlā is not primarily about "clientage" but about the "bonds of help, support, and succor that unite the Islamic umma as a truly functional faith community." The Quran, she shows, lays the foundation for the importance and ambivalence of the term mawlā throughout Islamic history.

Let's explore how the Prophet ﷺ turned the tribal world upside down.

🔄 1. The Ideological Overthrow: From Nasab to Taqwā

The Prophet’s ﷺ message was a direct assault on the core axioms of Jāhiliyyah.

Pre-Islamic Axiom	The Prophetic Revolution
"Your worth is your lineage (Nasab)."	"The best of you are the most pious (Taqwā)." (Quran 49:13)
"Help your tribe, right or wrong (‘Aṣabiyyah)."	"Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or oppressed." They asked, "O Messenger of God, we understand helping the oppressed, but how do we help the oppressor?" He said, "By seizing his hand." (Sahih al-Bukhari)
"The Mawlā is a permanent subordinate."	"If you do not know their fathers, they are your brothers in religion and your mawālī." (Quran 33:5)

This last verse, which Urban identifies as pivotal, is revolutionary. It severs the connection between social worth and known genealogy. In the new Ummah, the ultimate bond of Walā'—of mutual support and belonging—is faith itself. Everyone in the community is, in a spiritual sense, a mawlā of one another.

🤲 2. Uplifting the Marginalized: Slaves as the New Elite

The Prophet ﷺ didn't just preach equality; he enacted it in the most dramatic ways possible, by elevating those the old society despised most.

A. The Emancipator: He was a relentless advocate for manumission. His Sunnah is filled with exhortations to free slaves, making it an act of supreme piety and a common form of atonement for sins.

B. The Patron: As Urban’s case study of Abū Bakra shows, the Prophet ﷺ created new pathways for freed slaves. While Abū Bakra may have been a ṭalīq Allāh (one set loose by God) rather than a formal mawlā, the Prophet ensured his integration into the community, assigning him to a Muslim to be taught the Quran and the Sunan. This act transformed a former slave into a Companion of the Prophet.

C. The Commander: He appointed former slaves to positions of the highest authority, making them commanders over free-born nobles.

Companion	Background	Status & Achievement
Zayd ibn Ḥārithah 🏇	Former slave, adopted son of the Prophet.	Led the raid at Mu'tah, where he died holding the standard, commanding free-born Qurayshi nobles like Ja'far ibn Abī Ṭālib.
Usāmah ibn Zayd ⚔️	Son of Zayd, born to a freed slave.	At just 17-19 years old, the Prophet appointed him as commander of a major expedition against the Romans.
Bilāl ibn Rabāḥ 📣	Abyssinian slave, brutally tortured for his faith.	First Mu'adhdhin (Caller to Prayer) of Islam. His powerful voice from the rooftops of Medina was a constant, public declaration that the old hierarchies were dead. He was the Prophet's personal attendant and treasurer.
Salman al-Fārisī 🛡️	Persian seeker of truth, former slave.	The great military strategist who advised the Battle of the Trench (Khandaq), a tactic that saved Medina. The Prophet said, "Salman is one of us, the People of the House (Ahl al-Bayt)."

These were not token gestures. These men became the Prophet's most loyal and trusted companions precisely because their loyalty was to God and His Messenger alone, unfiltered by tribal ambition.

🏛️ 3. The New Social Contract: The Constitution of Medina

The Prophet ﷺ didn't just create a community of faith; he built a state. The "Constitution of Medina" was a political masterpiece that institutionalized his social vision.

• A Supra-Tribal Polity: It declared the believers from Quraysh, Yathrib (the Ansār), and those who followed them "one community (Ummah Wahidah) to the exclusion of all people." This was a formal Ḥilf (alliance) that transcended blood ties.

• The Operationalization of Walā': Crucially, as Urban points out, one article states: "The believers are the mawālī of one another, to the exclusion of other people." Here, mawālī doesn't mean "clients" in a hierarchical sense. It means "allies," "protectors," and "supporters." The bond of faith had become the new tribal bond, creating a network of mutual obligation and defense.

💎 Conclusion: The Birth of a New Civilization

The Prophet Muhammad’s ﷺ reforms were a seismic shift. By the time of his passing, the map of Arab society had been radically redrawn.

• Virtue, Not Blood: The new elite were those with the deepest faith, the most knowledge, and the greatest service to the community—the "brothers in religion."

• The Transformed Mawlā: The term mawlā was now charged with a powerful duality. It could still refer to a freed slave's social connection, but it was also the word describing the bond between all believers and, most loftily, the bond between the believers and God Himself ("God is the Mawlā of the believers..." Quran 47:11).

He took the old, rigid system of Walā' and infused it with a new spirit. He used the familiar language of tribal affiliation to build a community that could, for the first time, transcend tribe. In doing so, he created a social engine powerful enough to absorb millions of new converts from countless ethnicities into a burgeoning civilization.

The story of the Mawālī is the story of this revolution in practice. In the next section, we will see how this idealistic new system collided with the stubborn realities of empire, politics, and human nature during the Umayyad period, creating the tensions that would both threaten and ultimately strengthen the Islamic world.

⚔️ Section IV: The Conquest Era & Civil Wars (632-691 CE) – The System Under Strain

The dramatic expansion of the Islamic state after the Prophet’s death presented a monumental social challenge. The tiny Muslim community, once a relatively homogenous group in Arabia, was suddenly ruling over millions of non-Arabs from Spain to Sindh. The pre-existing walāʾ system, designed for a tribal context, was thrust into a new role as the primary mechanism for integrating outsiders into the conquering elite.

This period, culminating in two devastating civil wars (fitan), acted as a crucible, forging profound changes in the meaning and function of the mawālī. The system did not break; it evolved, revealing the tensions at the heart of the new Islamic empire.

🗺️ Phase 1: The Conquests (632-656 CE) – Incorporation by the Sword

The initial waves of conquest created a massive influx of new people into the Islamic orbit. The mawālī system was the primary tool for managing this influx, but its application was varied and often chaotic.

Mechanism of Entry	Description	Impact on Mawālī System
🛑 War Captives (Sabī)	Vast numbers of prisoners were taken as booty and enslaved. As Patricia Crone notes, sources hint at numbers so large they "exceeded or approached the total population of an entire Arab garrison city."	✅ Standardization: This was the most common origin for mawālī in this period. Upon manumission, they automatically became mawālī of their captors, reinforcing the individual patron-client bond.
🏃 Peasant Flight	Non-Arab peasants (ʿulūj, ʿajam) fled oppressive land taxes (kharāj) to the garrison cities (amsar) like Basra and Kufa, seeking better opportunities and conversion.	⚠️ Strain & Loopholes: To avoid being forced back to their lands, these free converts needed a patron. They would enter a walāʾ contract, often with a tribal leader, expanding the system beyond its original slave-manumission context.
🪖 Military Service	Some conquered peoples, like the Persian Asāwira, converted en masse and joined the Muslim armies as a coherent unit.	🔀 "Tribalization": These groups were often incorporated as a bloc, becoming mawālī of an entire tribe (e.g., the Asāwira became mawālī of Tamīm). This was walāʾ on a macro scale, grafting foreign military units onto the Arabian tribal structure.

The Big Picture of Phase 1:

The system was expansive and functional. The mawālī were:

• Integrated: They were the "relatives and mawālī" of their patrons, fully enmeshed in the tribal framework.

• Diverse: They included slaves, soldiers, and peasants from countless ethnic backgrounds (Persian, Aramean, Coptic, Berber).

• Relational, Not Ethnic: A person's identity was "Nāfiʿ, mawlā of al-Ḥārith al-Thaqafī," not "Nāfiʿ the Persian." The bond of walāʾ defined them, not their foreign origin. As Elizabeth Urban's research shows, the term ʿajam (non-Arab) in this period described complete outsiders, while mawālī were insiders.

💥 Phase 2: The First Fitna (656-661 CE) – Loyalty in a Tribal War

The first civil war was, at its core, a conflict between Arabian tribal factions (Quraysh, Ansar, Kalb) vying for the leadership of the community.

• The Role of Mawālī: In this conflict, mawālī appear almost exclusively as individual loyalists fighting alongside their patrons. They are an extension of the tribal household.

• Key Insight: The sources do not mention "the mawālī" as a collective political or social bloc. Their identity remains relational and subordinate to the tribal politics of their masters. They are part of the family, not a class apart.

🔥 Phase 3: The Second Fitna & The Crisis of the Tribe (680-692 CE)

This was the turning point. The tribal system, overburdened by decades of migration, new wealth, and demographic change, began to fracture, especially in the garrison city of Kufa. The mawālī became the symbol of this frightening collapse.

The Revolt of al-Mukhtār (685-687 CE): A Watershed Moment

Al-Mukhtār’s rebellion in Kufa was a masterclass in exploiting social fissures. He rallied the dispossessed by promising vengeance for al-Husayn and a share of the booty (fayʾ). Crucially, he appealed directly to the mawālī as a group, independent of their patrons.

Before al-Mukhtār	During al-Mukhtār's Revolt
👉 Mawālī were "our mawālī" – a relational term denoting belonging to a patron.	👉 "The mawālī" – a terrifying, monolithic collective that had broken its bonds of loyalty.
👉 They were integrated into the tribal structure.	👉 They represented social chaos and the collapse of the old hierarchy.
👉 Their loyalty was to their patron, based on tribal custom.	👉 Their allegiance could be bought with pay and promises, undermining the tribal economy of loyalty.

Quotes from the terrified Kufan Elite (as recorded by al-Ṭabarī):

"He has drawn our mawālī to him, mounted them on horses, paid them stipends, and handed our booty to them. Our slaves have disobeyed us..." (Ṭabarī, II:649)

"Our slaves and mawālī have wrested our wives, children, and families away from us." (Ṭabarī, II:719)

Here, the mawālī are a force of chaos. The Kufan nobility’s fear was not primarily ethnic ("non-Arabs are rising"); it was social ("the entire structure of our world is collapsing"). The mawālī embodied the disintegration of the loyalties that held their society together.

The tribal breakdown forced a re-evaluation of what it meant to be "noble" (sharīf).

• The Old Guard (like Muṣʿab b. al-Zubayr): Tried to reinforce a strict, blood-based definition of nobility, railing against mawālī, peasants (ʿulūj), and those of slave origin who had risen in rank.

• The New Vision: A counter-current emerged, suggesting that sharaf could be based on Islamic virtue and merit. In one account, a mawlā named al-Faḍl b. Marwān is described as "a noble among the mawālī" (sharīfan fī al-mawālī), who defies the tyrant al-Ḥajjāj in the name of God. This hinted at a new, more inclusive social hierarchy in the making.

📊 Summary: The Transformation of the Mawālī (632-691 CE)

The following table charts the dramatic evolution of the mawālī's identity and role through this tumultuous period.

Period	Primary Identity	Social Position	Key Change
🏹 Early Conquests (632-656)	Relational ("Mawlā of X")	✅ Integrated Insider (Part of the tribal household)	System functions as a tool for incorporating outsiders into a tribal framework.
⚔️ First Fitna (656-661)	Loyalist (Fights with patron's tribe)	✅ Tribal Appendage (No independent political role)	Mawālī remain a background element in an Arabian tribal conflict.
🔥 Second Fitna (680-692)	Collective & Symbolic ("The Mawālī" as a class)	⚠️ Liminal & Threatening (Symbol of tribal breakdown)	THE CRITICAL SHIFT: Mawālī emerge as a stand-alone social force, representing the collapse of the old order and the terrifying birth of a new one.

By the end of the Second Civil War, the mawālī system was forever changed. It was no longer just a neat mechanism for fitting outsiders into the tribe. It had become:

1. A Point of Tension: The mawālī were now a visible, sometimes feared, social group whose aspirations and grievances could no longer be ignored.

2. A Site of Ideological Struggle: Debates raged between those who wanted to restrict nobility to Arabian lineage and those who advocated for a new, Islamic meritocracy in which a virtuous mawlā could be a sharīf.

3. Politicized: The genie was out of the bottle. The mawālī had been mobilized as a collective political and military force. Future rebels and rulers would not forget the power inherent in this vast and growing segment of society.

The relatively simple, relational system of the Prophet's era had been shattered by the scale of conquest and the fires of civil war. In its place was a more complex, fraught, and dynamic social landscape, setting the stage for the even greater transformations of the late Umayyad and Abbasid periods.

⚐ Section V: The Marwanid Era (691-750 CE) – The Mawālī as a Pillar of the State

The Second Fitna (680-692 CE) shattered the old Sufyanid system. The Umayyad dynasty, now under the Marwanid branch, faced a fundamental problem: the Arabian tribal structure, the very backbone of the early state, was no longer a viable framework for governing a vast, cosmopolitan empire.

In this new era, the mawālī ceased to be just individual clients and became the essential fuel for a new political and military machine. Their story in this period is the story of the Umayyad state's desperate attempt to adapt, and its ultimate failure to fully harness the power it had unleashed.

🏛️ The Breakdown of the Old Order: From Tribe to Faction

The Sufyanid state relied on indirect rule through tribal chieftains (ashrāf). The Marwanids, especially Abd al-Malik (r. 685-705), began a radical centralization.

Old Sufyanid System (Pre-Second Fitna)	New Marwanid Reality (Post-Second Fitna)
Power Base: Tribal militias (Qabīla)	Power Base: Professional, standing armies (Jund)
Recruitment: By tribe and kinship	Recruitment: Voluntary enlistment (mutṭawwi'a)
Identity: Tribal (Qaysi, Yemeni)	Identity: Military Faction (Qays vs. Yemen as political blocs)
Mawālī Role: Individual clients within a tribe	Mawālī Role: Independent military regiments

➡️ The Crucial Shift: As Patricia Crone identified, the army's composition and organization became "dislocated from the tribal structures of conquest." The unwieldy tribal militia was replaced by a professional army where loyalty was to a general and a paycheck, not to a tribal chief.

⚔️ The New Armies: Where the Mawālī Took Center Stage

The Marwanid military revolution had two key features that directly involved the mawālī.

1. Voluntary Enlistment & The Professional Soldier 🪖

Gone were the days of mustering entire tribes. Governors like the infamous al-Hajjaj (in Iraq) and others actively recruited soldiers, offering a price for a horse, arms, and a salary (e.g., 300 dirhams).

• Who joined? Landless Arabs, but increasingly, non-Arabs seeking social and economic advancement.

• The Mutṭawwi'a (Volunteers): These were irregular troops, often motivated by plunder. They provided a massive, flexible pool of manpower, and they were overwhelmingly non-Arab.

2. The Institutionalization of Mawālī Regiments

This is the most visible change. The mawālī were no longer scattered as individuals among Arab tribes; they were now organized into their own distinct units within the army.

• Syria under Abd al-Malik: Mawālī formed "a quarter or fifth of their own" in the army.

• Iraq under al-Hajjaj: He created new muqātila (fighting units) that included large numbers of mawālī.

• Khurasan under Qutayba b. Muslim: Separate mawālī units were a key part of the eastern armies.

• Named Regiments: We see the rise of regiments named after their (often mawlā) commanders, like the Waddāhiyya (after a Berber freedman of Abd al-Malik) or the Sayābija (Indian/Persian Gulf origin troops).

💡 The Implication: The state now had a direct relationship with "the mawālī" as a collective military entity, bypassing the old tribal patrons. This gave the mawālī a new, powerful sense of group identity and leverage.

🎭 The Rise of Factionalism: Qays vs. Yemen (A New Kind of Tribe)

With the real tribe obsolete as a political unit, the army needed a new way to organize loyalty. They grafted their new professional identities onto the old, overarching tribal confederacies: Qays (Northern Arabs) and Yemen (Southern Arabs).

• It wasn't about real genealogy: A Kindi tribesman was a "Yemeni" in the army because his regiment was labeled as such. A Persian mawlā in the same regiment was also a "Yemeni."

• A Political Language: Factionalism became the language of political competition. A governor from a Qaysi background would appoint Qaysi sub-governors, who would in turn reward Qaysi officers. The mawālī were swept into this system, their fortunes tied to their faction's success.

This is where the mawālī and `ajam (non-Arabs) begin to be conceptually lumped together. The Yemen faction, for example, often had more mawālī in its ranks. Opponents would then dismiss the entire faction as being dominated by "clients and non-Arabs," using it as a political slur. This was an external label, not necessarily how the mawālī saw themselves.

📈 The Economic Squeeze & The Peasant Convert

The story isn't just about soldiers. The Marwanid period saw a massive fiscal crisis driven by conversion.

The Problem in a Nutshell:

-

A non-Muslim peasant paid the Kharāj (land tax) → This tax funded the state and the army.

If he converted to Islam and moved to the city → He should, in theory, be exempt from Kharāj and only pay the Muslim alms (Zakāt).

Result: The tax base collapses.

The Umayyad Response was Inconsistent and Oppressive:

• Al-Hajjaj's Brutality: He famously rounded up peasant converts who had fled to Basra and Kufa and forcibly returned them to their lands, insisting they still pay the Kharāj.

• The "Test" of Islam: Some governors, like al-Jarrah in Khurasan, tried to impose tests like circumcision to discourage "insincere" conversion for tax reasons.

➡️ The Backlash: This created immense resentment. As John Nawas's research suggests, these fugitive peasants were the typical converts of the Marwanid period. Their treatment became a powerful source of anti-Umayyad sentiment, fueling the belief that the state was un-Islamic.

👑 The "Reformer" Caliph: Umar II (r. 717-720)

Umar II stands as a symbolic figure who recognized these crises. His brief reign was an attempt to fix the system.

Problem Umar Faced	Umar II's Proposed Solution
Taxation of Muslim Converts: Mawālī being forced to pay the Kharāj.	Fiscal Rescript: He ordered that any convert be removed from the Kharāj roll and only pay Zakāt. "God sent Muhammad to call people to Islam, not to tax them."
Exclusion & Discrimination: Mawālī in the army without proper pay or status.	Integration: He insisted that any convert who prayed, was circumcised, and knew the Quran must be treated as a full Muslim with "what the Muslims have and the obligations they are subject to."
The "Peasant Flight" Crisis:	Justice over Revenue: He warned his governors against seizing the land of those who fled, arguing that oppression was the root cause.

💔 The Outcome: Umar's reforms were politically and financially disastrous for the short-term stability of the state. They were almost entirely reversed by his successors, like Yazid II and Hisham, who prioritized fiscal health over ideological purity. This demonstrated the fundamental contradiction of the Umayyad state: it could not be both an Arab tribal hegemony and a universal Islamic empire.

🎯 Conclusion: The Mawālī on the Eve of Revolution

By the 740s, the transformation was complete. The mawālī were:

1. A Military Mainstay: They were no longer auxiliaries but formed the core of many armies, with their own command structures and corporate identity.

2. A Politicized Class: Integrated into the Qays/Yemen factions, they were active participants in the high-stakes game of Umayyad politics.

3. A Source of Religious Legitimacy: Their grievances—taxation, social discrimination—were framed in Islamic terms, making them a natural constituency for any movement claiming to champion a more egalitarian Islam.

4. The Key to Power: As Crone argues, governors were now generals, not kinsmen. Their power depended on their ability to command loyalty, often by building private retinues (ashāb) of loyal troops, which included large numbers of mawālī.

The Umayyads, in their quest to build a stable empire, had created the very instrument of their downfall. They had armed, organized, and politicized the mawālī, but failed to fully grant them the social and economic equality promised by their faith. When the Abbasid call went out from Khurasan for a new order based on justice and the rights of the Prophet's family, it found its most fervent soldiers not among the disgruntled Arab tribes, but among these very mawālī of the mawālī—the fully Islamized, professional, and ambitious descendants of the first converts, who were ready to topple the old order and build a new one in which they would be the pillars, not the clients.

⚰️ Section VI: The Long Goodbye – The Death of the Mawālī System

The Abbasid Revolution (750 CE) was the mawālī's finest hour. It was their armies, their grievances, and their aspirations that toppled the Umayyad caliphate. For a moment, it seemed the old system of Arab tribal privilege was shattered forever. A new, cosmopolitan Islamic empire beckoned, where piety and service—not pedigree—would determine one's place.

But the triumph of the mawālī contained the seeds of their system's obsolescence. The very success of the Abbasid Revolution set in motion forces that would render the classical mawlā-patron bond a relic of a bygone era. Its death was not sudden, but a slow, complex process spanning the 9th and 10th centuries, driven by three key factors:

1. The Failure of the "Islamic Aristocracy"

2. The Rise of the Slave Soldier (Mamlūk)

3. The Great Divorce: State and Society

1. The Aborted "Islamic Aristocracy" 🏛️

The Abbasids tried to create a new ruling class to replace the old Arab tribal elite. This was the "Islamic Service Aristocracy," built on the principle of dawla (the revolution) and ṣābiqa (priority of service).

The New Elite	Who They Were	Their Role & Ideal
Ahl al-Dawla ("People of the Revolution")	The Khurasani soldiers who brought the Abbasids to power.	The new imperial garrison, replacing the Syrians. A corporate identity based on participation in the foundational event.
Abnā' ("Sons of the Revolution")	The descendants of the original Khurasani revolutionaries, especially those settled in Baghdad.	The core of the new military and administrative elite. Meant to be a hereditary pillar of the state, fusing Persian martial spirit with Abbasid legitimacy.
Ahl al-Bayt ("People of the House")	The Abbasid family itself, plus honorary kin and foster-children from the Abnā'.	The highest elite, bound to the caliph by real or fictive kinship, meant to secure unwavering loyalty.

This new aristocracy was an ideological project. It tried to base nobility on service to the Islamic revolution. But the ideology didn't stick.

• Shi'ites felt cheated, believing the true "People of the House" were the Alids, not the Abbasids.

• Sunnis were largely indifferent. They hadn't yearned for this "redemption" and saw the Abbasids as just another set of rulers.

• The Abnā' themselves assimilated into the Baghdadi populace, lost their distinct Khurasani identity, and their religious fervor cooled into mainstream Sunnism.

The grand project of creating a legitimized, integrated ruling class failed. The caliphs found themselves morally and politically isolated.

2. The Slave Soldier Solution: The Mamlūk Rises ⚔️

Facing a crisis of legitimacy and unable to rely on the fading Abnā', the Abbasid caliphs made a fateful turn. They began to bypass free society altogether, creating a new military force defined by two qualities: total dependence and cultural alienation.

This was the birth of the classical Mamlūk (slave soldier) institution.

	The Old Mawālī System	The New Mamlūk System
🔗 Bond	Walā' (Patronage): A legal-social contract with rights and duties, integrating the client into the Muslim community.	Ownership & Manumission: A master-slave relationship. Manumission was often perfunctory; the soldier remained a "mamlūk" (owned one).
🌍 Identity	Aspirational Muslim: A convert seeking integration into the Arab-Islamic tribal structure.	Permanent Alien: Often Turkish, recruited from the steppes. Deliberately kept in cultural quarantine (e.g., in Samarra) to prevent assimilation.
🎯 Purpose	Social Integration & Military Service: To be a Muslim soldier within the societal framework.	Political Tool: To be a military automaton, loyal only to the caliph, with no ties to the local populace or religious elites.

Why This Killed the Mawālī System:

-

The mamlūk was the antithesis of the mawlā.

• The mawlā system was a pathway into society.

• The mamlūk system was a tool for a ruler to stand above society.

When the state's primary military and political muscle is composed of slaves who are deliberately kept outside the social fabric, there is no more need for the complex institution of walā' to integrate free, non-Arab converts. The state and society began their dramatic divorce.

3. The Great Divorce and the "Medieval Polity" 🏙️

By the 10th century, the transformation was complete. The Abbasid caliphs became figureheads, and real power was held by mamlūk generals and, later, by Shi'ite dynasties like the Buyids (945 CE).

This led to the emergence of the classical "Medieval Islamic Polity," characterized by a fundamental disjunction:

• 💂‍♂️ The State: Run by a succession of foreign military elites (Turks, Daylamites, etc.), often slave-born, with little connection to the people they ruled.

• 📚 The Society: Composed of the local, urban, Arabic/Persian-speaking population, led by a new class of "Local Notables" (A'yān).

These notables were the true heirs of the mawālī spirit, but in a transformed world. They were scholars ('ulamā'), landowners, and merchants who held social and religious authority but were divorced from political power. The story of the mawālī—the struggle of non-Arabs for political inclusion—was over because politics itself was now seen as a separate, often distasteful, domain.

⏳ When Did the Mawālī System Finally Die?

There is no single date, but a clear timeline of obsolescence:

• 🌅 750-850 CE (The Abbasid Century): The system is at its peak but begins to decay. The Abnā' aristocracy fails, and the first mamlūks appear under Caliphs like al-Mu'taṣim (r. 833-842).

• 📉 850-950 CE (The Century of Crisis): This is the period of "slow death." The mamlūk institution becomes the military norm. The caliphate fragments. The old mawlā relationship is irrelevant to the new power dynamics. The class of "clients" still exists, but they are no longer a potent political or military collective.

• ⚰️ Post-950 CE (The Medieval Era): The system is a memory. The term mawlā persists, but its classical meaning—a client integrated into a tribe via walā'—is a historical artifact. Society is now structured between a foreign military state and a local civilian society, with no need for the tribal-patronage bridge that the mawālī once represented.

In conclusion, the mawālī system did not die from failure but from success and subsequent supersession. It helped create a universal Islamic society, but in doing so, it made the Arab-tribal framework obsolete. The Abbasids, unable to build a stable Islamic ruling class, opted for slave soldiers, irrevocably splitting the political and social spheres. The mawlā, the quintessential figure of the early imperial era, faded into history, leaving behind a world where identity was no longer negotiated through patronage, but defined by faith, scholarship, and local belonging, under the watch of a foreign soldier's sword.

🏁 Conclusion: The Mawālī's Journey – From Tribal Bond to Cosmopolitan Memory

The story of the mawālī is not a side note in Islamic history; it is the story of how a small Arabian community transformed into a world civilization. Their journey, spanning over four centuries, is a powerful narrative of integration, tension, and transformation, reflecting the very evolution of Islamic society itself.

The table below encapsulates this profound transformation:

Era	🕰️ Timeline	🎭 Primary Role of the Mawālī	🔗 Nature of the Walā' Bond	🌍 Broader Significance
🏜️ Jāhiliyya	Pre-630 CE	Tribal Affiliate (Freed slave, ally, protectorate)	Fluid & Reciprocal A social contract for mutual survival and strength in a tribal world.	A mechanism for tribal flexibility, allowing outsiders to be incorporated into the Arabian social fabric.
🌙 Prophetic & Rāshidūn	610-661 CE	Brother in Faith Early Muslim convert, especially those without a tribe.	Spiritual & Legal Revolution Quran 33:5 redefines mawlā as a bond of religious brotherhood, transcending blood.	Foundation of the Ummah; faith, not genealogy, becomes the primary source of belonging.
⚔️ Umayyad Period	661-750 CE	Client-Soldier-Scholar The non-Arab Muslim: integral yet often marginalized.	Political & Social Tension The old tribal bond clashes with the new reality of a vast, multi-ethnic empire.	The central social paradox of the era: the engine of empire and the source of its greatest unrest.
🏛️ Early Abbasid Revolution	750-850 CE	Imperial Elite The Abnā': the victorious revolutionary vanguard.	Apogee & Ideology Walā' is glorified as loyalty to the "Blessed Dynasty" (al-Dawla).	The apparent triumph of the mawālī ideal, creating a brief, cosmopolitan Islamic aristocracy.
💀 Late Abbasid & Fragmentation	850-1000 CE	Irrelevance & Memory System replaced by slave soldiers (Mamlūks).	Obsolescence The state-society split makes the classical client-patron bond redundant.	Marks the final divorce between a foreign military state and a localized Islamic society.

➡️ The Arc of Transformation: A Summary

The trajectory of the mawālī can be visualized as a dramatic arc:

🏜️ Jāhiliyya (Flexible Tribalism) → 🌙 Early Islam (Spiritual Revolution) → ⚔️ Umayyads (System Under Strain) → 🏛️ Early Abbasids (Cosmopolitan Peak) → 💀 Post-850 CE (Slow Fade into Memory)

This journey reveals several core truths:

1. It Was Never Just About "Non-Arabs". The reduction of mawlā to "non-Arab Muslim" is a modern oversimplification. Initially, it was a relational status, defining one's position within a network. Even an Arab could be a mawlā.

2. The Quran was Revolutionary. By declaring believers without known fathers to be "your brothers in religion and your mawālī" (Quran 33:5), the text shattered the pre-Islamic link between genealogy and social value, creating a new, faith-based community.

3. The System Was a Bridge. For centuries, walā' was the essential institutional bridge that allowed millions of Persians, Berbers, Copts, and others to cross into the Muslim polity, not as conquered subjects, but as integrated members.

4. Its Death Was a Sign of Success. The decline of the mawālī system was not a failure. It died because it was too successful. It helped create a universal Islamic society where the old Arab-tribal framework was no longer the sole organizing principle. Once society was fully Islamized, the need for a special "client" status for converts faded.

🎯 The Final Legacy

By the year 1000 CE, the classical mawālī system was a memory. Its end was sealed by two developments:

• ⬆️ The Rise of the Mamlūk: The state chose total dependence (slave soldiers) over social integration (free clients).

• ⬇️ The Localization of Society: Islamic society reorganized around urban notables (a'yān), scholars ('ulamā'), and Sufi orders, creating new forms of identity and belonging that made the old patron-client ties obsolete.

The mawālī did not disappear; they simply won. They ceased to be a distinct group because their descendants were the Islamic civilization itself—the scholars, the poets, the viziers, and the merchants. Their struggle for belonging forged a new world, proving that the ultimate victory is not in being labeled as an outsider joining in, but in reshaping the center so completely that the label itself becomes history.

THE END

📚 Works Cited

ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī. Al-Muṣannaf. Edited by Ḥabīb al-Raḥmān al-Aʿẓamī, al-Majlis al-ʿIlmī, 1970–72. 11 vols.

Abū Ḥanīfah, al-Nuʿmān ibn Thābit. Kitāb al-Āthār. Translated by Abdassamad Clarke, Turath Publishing, 2006.

al-Baghawī, al-Ḥusayn ibn Masʿūd. Maʿālim al-Tanzīl fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd Allāh al-Nimr et al., 4th ed., Dār Ṭaybah, 1997. 8 vols.

al-Balādhurī, Aḥmad ibn Yaḥyā. History of the Arab Invasions: The Conquest of the Lands. Translated and with commentary by Hugh Kennedy, I.B. Tauris, 2022.

Bernards, Monique, and John Nawas, editors. Patronate and Patronage in Early and Classical Islam. Brill, 2005.

Bosanquet, Antonia. “The Kitābī Wife’s Conversion to Islam: An Unusual Interpretation by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya.” Islamic Law and Society, vol. 26, 2019, pp. 1–29.

Bulliet, Richard W. Conversion to Islam in the Medieval Period: An Essay in Quantitative History. Harvard UP, 1979.

The Chronicle of Zuqnīn, Parts III and IV: A.D. 488–775. Translated with notes by Amir Harrak, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1999.

Crone, Patricia. Slaves on Horses: The Evolution of the Islamic Polity. Cambridge UP, 1980.

---. The Nativist Prophets of Early Islamic Iran: Rural Revolt and Local Zoroastrianism. Cambridge UP, 2012.

Daryaee, Touraj. Sasanian Persia: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. I.B. Tauris, 2023.

Grierson, Philip. Byzantine Coinage. 2nd ed., Dumbarton Oaks, 1999.

Hoyland, Robert G. Seeing Islam as Others Saw It: A Survey and Evaluation of Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrian Writings on Early Islam. Gorgias Press, 2019.

Hurvitz, Nimrod, et al., editors. Conversion to Islam in the Premodern Age: A Sourcebook. U of California P, 2020.

Ibn Manẓūr, Abū al-Faḍl Jamāl al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Mukram al-Anṣārī. Lisān al-‘Arab. Dār Ṣādir, 2003. 15 vols.

Ibn Qudāmah, Muwaffaq al-Dīn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad. Al-Mughnī. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1985. 10 vols.

Ibn Saʿd, Muḥammad ibn Saʿd ibn Maniʿ al-Zuhrī. al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kabīr. Edited by ʿAlī Muḥammad ʿUmar, 1st ed., Maktabat al-Khānijī, 2001. 11 vols.

Ibrahim, Ayman S. Conversion to Islam: Competing Themes in Early Islamic Historiography. Oxford UP, 2021.

John, Bishop of Nikiu. The Chronicle of John, Bishop of Nikiu. Translated by R. H. Charles, Text and Translation Society, 1916.

Kaegi, Walter E. Byzantium and the Early Islamic Conquests. Cambridge UP, 1992.

Kennedy, Hugh. The Armies of the Caliphs: Military and Society in the Early Islamic State. Routledge, 2001.

Köse, Ali. “The Assessment of Various Factors in the Spread of Islam During the Medieval Period.” İslâm Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 1, 1997, pp. 65–89.

Levy-Rubin, Milka. Non-Muslims in the Early Islamic Empire: From Surrender to Coexistence. Cambridge UP, 2011.

Mālik ibn Anas. Al-Muwaṭṭaʾ. Translated by Aisha Abdurrahman Bewley, Diwan Press, 2014.

al-Māwardī, ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad. Al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭāniyyah. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, n.d.

---. Al-Ḥāwī al-Kabīr fī Fiqh Madhhab al-Imām al-Shāfiʿī. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1999. 18 vols.

Mutter, Jessica Sylvan. By the Book: Conversion and Religious Identity in Early Islamic Bilād al-Shām and al-Jazīra. PhD dissertation, U of Chicago, 2018.

Nawas, John. “A Client’s Client: The Process of Islamization in Early and Classical Islam.” Journal of Abbasid Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014, pp. 43–58.

Papaconstantinou, Arietta, et al., editors. Conversion in Late Antiquity: Christianity, Islam, and Beyond. Routledge, 2016.

Peacock, A. C. S., editor. Islamisation: Comparative Perspectives from History. Edinburgh UP, 2017.

Penn, Michael Philip. When Christians First Met Muslims: A Sourcebook of the Earliest Syriac Writings on Islam. U of California P, 2015.

Petersen, Leif Inge Ree. Siege Warfare and Military Organization in the Successor States (400–800 AD): Byzantium, the West and Islam. Brill, 2013.

Sahner, Christian C. Christian Martyrs under Islam: Religious Violence and the Making of the Muslim World. Princeton UP, 2018.

Sear, David R. Byzantine Coins and Their Values. 2nd ed., Seaby Ltd., 1987.

Sebeos. The Armenian History Attributed to Sebeos. Translated by R. W. Thomson, commentary by James Howard-Johnston with Tim Greenwood, Liverpool UP, 1999.

al-Shāfiʿī, Muḥammad ibn Idrīs. Al-Umm. Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1990. 8 vols.

Simonsohn, Uriel. “Conversion, Exemption, and Manipulation: Social Benefits and Conversion to Islam in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages.” Medieval Worlds, no. 6, 2017, pp. 196–216.

---. Female Power and Religious Change in the Medieval Near East. Oxford UP, 2023.

al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān. Dār al-Tarbiyah wa-al-Turāth, n.d. 24 vols.

Tanous, Jack Boulos Victor. Syria Between Byzantium and Islam: Making Incommensurables Speak. PhD dissertation, Princeton U, 2010.

Tannous, Jack. The Making of the Medieval Middle East: Religion, Society, and Simple Believers. Princeton UP, 2018.

Urban, Elizabeth. Conquered Populations in Early Islam: Non-Arabs, Slaves and the Sons of Slave Mothers. Edinburgh UP, 2020.

---. The Early Islamic Mawālī: A Window onto Processes of Identity Construction and Social Change. PhD dissertation, U of Chicago, 2012.

Yāqūt al-Ḥamawī. Muʿjam al-Buldān. 2nd ed., Dār Ṣādir, 1995. 7 vols.