"Permission to Fight?": Decoding Qur'an 22:38-41 and the Birth of a Just War Doctrine in Late Antiquity

"Permission to Fight?": Decoding Qur'an 22:39 and the Birth of a Just War Doctrine in Late Antiquity

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ 

"In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful."

If there is one verse in the Qur’an that has been weaponized to portray Islam as an inherently militant faith, both by modern critics and by extremist elements within the Muslim world, it is the directive to “fight in the way of God.” For many, the very concept of Jihad is synonymous with unprovoked, expansionist warfare, casting a long shadow over the religion’s foundational principles.

This reading presents the Prophet Muhammad’s military campaigns as a relentless offensive, a divinely-sanctioned crusade born from the arid deserts of seventh-century Arabia. In this narrative, the Qur’an appears to sanctify a trajectory of violence that stands in jarring contradiction to its overarching ethos of mercy, justice, and peaceful persuasion.

This blog post will dismantle the polemical fortress built around the Islamic concept of war. By decoding the pivotal revelation of Qur’an 22:39—the first ever verse to permit fighting—it will contrast the scripture’s own holistic, ethical vision of constrained conflict with the decontextualized, literalist claims of its abusers. It will demonstrate how a directive aimed at ending persecution and establishing a just peace was twisted into an instrument of aggression. Drawing upon the meticulous historical work of scholars like Joel Hayward, we will explore the late antique context of the Prophet’s campaigns—a world of ceaseless tribal raids and superpower warfare—and the rigorous ethical rules (forbidding the killing of non-combatants, trees, and destruction) that governed them.

This is the story of a verse that did not unleash war, but sought to regulate it; a prophetic mission that redefined martial ethics in its time, and a classical legal wisdom that birthed a sophisticated "just war" doctrine for those willing to see it.

Part I: The Blueprint in the Book – A Linguistic & Thematic Unpacking of Qur'an 22:38-41

To understand the revolutionary nature of the first war verse, we must read it not in isolation, but as the climax of a powerful thematic sequence. The page itself constructs a complete theological and legal framework.

The Verses (Surah Al-Hajj 22:38-41):

۞ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُدَافِعُ عَنِ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ كُلَّ خَوَّانٍ كَفُورٍ (38)

أُذِنَ لِلَّذِينَ يُقَاتَلُونَ بِأَنَّهُمْ ظُلِمُوا ۚ وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ نَصْرِهِمْ لَقَدِيرٌ (39)

الَّذِينَ أُخْرِجُوا مِن دِيَارِهِم بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ إِلَّا أَن يَقُولُوا رَبُّنَا اللَّهُ ۗ وَلَوْلَا دَفْعُ اللَّهِ النَّاسَ بَعْضَهُم بِبَعْضٍ لَّهُدِّمَتْ صَوَامِعُ وَبِيَعٌ وَصَلَوَاتٌ وَمَسَاجِدُ يُذْكَرُ فِيهَا اسْمُ اللَّهِ كَثِيرًا ۗ وَلَيَنصُرَنَّ اللَّهُ مَن يَنصُرُهُ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَقَوِيٌّ عَزِيزٌ (40)

الَّذِينَ إِن مَّكَّنَّاهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ أَقَامُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَآتَوُا الزَّكَاةَ وَأَمَرُوا بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَنَهَوْا عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ ۗ وَلِلَّهِ عَاقِبَةُ الْأُمُورِ (41)

Verse 38: The Divine Promise & Moral Foundation - An Expanded Analysis

۞ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُدَافِعُ عَنِ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ كُلَّ خَوَّانٍ كَفُورٍ (38)

Linguistic Deep Dive 🎯

• إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُدَافِعُ (Inna Allāha yudāfiʿu): "Indeed, Allah defends..."

  • The form is يُدَافِعُ (yudāfiʿu), from the root د-ف-ع (d-f-ʿ). This is a Form III verb, which often implies mutual or reciprocal action. While the simpler Form I يَدْفَعُ (yadfa'u) means "to push away," يُدَافِعُ carries a stronger sense of "to ward off," "to actively defend against," or "to repel an ongoing assault."

  • 📖 Classical Commentary: As highlighted by Al-Baghawi, this reading ("yudāfiʿu") was the dominant recitation. He explains it as "يدفع غائلة المشركين عن المؤمنين" - He repels the calamity/aggression of the polytheists from the believers. Al-Tabari uses the same phrase, "يدفع غائلة المشركين", emphasizing God's action as a direct response to an active threat.

• عَنِ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا (ʿani alladhīna āmanū): "...on behalf of those who have believed."

  • The preposition عَن (ʿan) is crucial. It doesn't just mean "from," but "on behalf of," "in defense of." This establishes a covenant relationship: God acts for the believers.

• إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ كُلَّ خَوَّانٍ كَفُورٍ (Inna Allāha lā yuḥibbu kulla khawwānin kafūr): "Indeed, Allah does not love every treacherous, ungrateful one."

  • خَوَّانٍ (khawwān): An intensive form, meaning "habitually treacherous," "a great betrayer." This isn't a simple mistake but a character trait of profound disloyalty.

  • كَفُورٍ (kafūr): Also an intensive form, meaning "intensely ungrateful," "one who covers up or denies divine blessings."

  • 📖 Classical Commentary: Al-Tabari defines the "خوّان" as one who "betrays God by opposing His command and prohibition, and disobeys Him," and the "كفور" as one who is "ungrateful for His blessings." Al-Baghawi and Ibn Abbas link this directly to the sin of shirk (associating partners with God), framing it as the ultimate betrayal and ingratitude.

Thematic Role & Flow ➡️

This verse is the unshakable PREMISE upon which the entire "permission to fight" is built. Its role is twofold:

1. Establishes the Cosmic Reality: Before any human action is even contemplated, the verse places the conflict in a divine framework. The primary actor is God. The believers are not the initiators; they are the beneficiaries of God's active, intervening defense. This completely re-frames the upcoming "permission" not as a human crusade, but as participation in a divine dynamic.

2. Sets the Moral Axis: By stating what God does not love, it creates an unambiguous moral dichotomy. The opponents are not just political enemies; they are defined by traits of ultimate treachery (خيانة) and ingratitude (كفر). This provides the moral justification for why God would "defend" against them. As Al-Tabari specifies, this defense was active even before the Hijrah ("before their migration"), protecting the believers living amidst the polytheists in Mecca.

Flow to Verse 39: This premise makes the permission in Verse 39 a logical consequence. If God defends the believers, and the persecution continues to the point of expulsion, then God's method of defense may now include permitting the believers to become the physical agents of His divine defense. The battle shifts from a purely spiritual realm to include the physical, but the ultimate Defender remains the same

"Big Idea" Refined 🛡️

"God is the Primary Defender; Human Action is a Subset of Divine Will."

This verse teaches that the Islamic concept of war, from its very inception, is theocentric, not anthropocentric. The "struggle" (Jihad) begins with God's action. The subsequent human permission is a tool within that larger divine strategy to repel injustice (دفع الغائلة). It removes any notion of a vengeful or aggressive human initiative and roots the entire endeavor in a cosmic struggle between divine protection and treacherous, ungrateful oppression.

Verse 39: The Conditional Permission - An Expanded Analysis

أُذِنَ لِلَّذِينَ يُقَاتَلُونَ بِأَنَّهُمْ ظُلِمُوا ۚ وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ نَصْرِهِمْ لَقَدِيرٌ (39)

Linguistic Deep Dive & The 624 CE Context 🎯

This verse is the legal cornerstone. Its precise wording, revealed in the specific context of Medinan persecution, is everything.

Linguistic Element	Analysis & Classical Commentary (Al-Tabari)	The 624 CE Context & Implications ⚖️
أُذِنَ (Udhina) ("Permission is granted")	Al-Tabari details a major scholarly debate over the recitation (qira'at): • أُذِنَ (Udhina - passive): "Permission was granted" without naming who granted it. This emphasizes the concessionary nature. • أَذِنَ (Adhina - active): "He (Allah) gave permission." Al-Tabari prefers this reading because it connects directly to Verse 38: "Allah does not love the treacherous... so Allah gave permission to fight them." This creates a tight, causal link. ➡️ The Core Idea: In both readings, this is a permission (idhn), not a command (amr). It is a legal relief from a previous prohibition.	After the Hijrah (622 CE), the Muslims in Medina were not safe. The Meccan Quraysh declared them outlaws, confiscated their property, and were actively plotting their annihilation. This verse, revealed around 624 CE just before Badr, was the divine answer to their plight. It was a legal authorization for self-defense after years of patient persecution.
لِلَّذِينَ يُقَاتَلُونَ (Lilladhīna Yuqātalūn) ("To those who are being fought")	This is the most critical grammatical point. يُقَاتَلُونَ (Yuqātalūn) is in the passive voice (Form VII). Al-Tabari explains the debate: • يُقَاتَلُونَ (Yuqātalūn): "Those who are being fought" - the passive reading. • يُقَاتِلُونَ (Yuqātilūn): "Those who fight" - the active reading. He notes the meanings are close but prefers the active reading to fit his preferred flow. However, the dominant and most powerful reading is the PASSIVE. It frames the believers as the objects of aggression, not the initiators.	This directly reflects the reality of 624 CE. The Muslims were the targets of Meccan aggression. They were the ones "being fought." The permission is given to the victims. This linguistically locks the ruling into a defensive posture. It is not a blanket permit for those who want to fight, but a specific right for those who are being attacked.
بِأَنَّهُمْ ظُلِمُوا (bi-annahum ẓulimū) ("Because they were wronged")	The particle بِأَنَّ (bi-anna) means "on account of the fact that" or "because." It introduces the sole and sufficient cause for the permission. Al-Tabari's narrations from Ibn Abbas and others explicitly define this "wrong": • "They were wronged by the polytheists fighting them." • "The Prophet and his companions when they were expelled from Mecca." The cause is concrete: violent persecution and exile.	This clause is the "casus belli" (cause for war). The "wrong" (ظُلِمُوا) was not an abstract insult. It was the active, violent persecution by the Quraysh: expulsion from homes, confiscation of property, and ongoing military threats against their new sanctuary in Medina. The cause is redress of injustice, not propagation of faith.
وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ نَصْرِهِمْ لَقَدِيرٌ ("And indeed, Allah is competent to grant them victory.")	This is a divine assurance. After granting a difficult permission, God couples it with a promise of His power and support. It reinforces the theme from Verse 38: the battle's outcome is in God's hands.	For the small, vulnerable Medinan community facing the military superpower of the Quraysh, this was a vital morale and faith booster. It framed their upcoming struggle not as a fool's errand, but as a divinely-backed endeavor.

Thematic Role & Flow ➡️

This verse is the LEGAL DECREE that flows with perfect logic from the PREMISE of Verse 38.

• Verse 38 (Theology): "God defends the believers and hates the oppressors."

• ➡️ Verse 39 (Law): "Therefore, God permits the believers who are being attacked to fight back because they are victims of that oppression."

It transforms the abstract concept of God's defense into a tangible, divinely-sanctioned human action. The permission is reactive, conditional, and causal. It is a right that is activated only when specific conditions are met.

Flow to Verse 40: Verse 40 immediately follows by justifying and universalizing this specific permission. It explains who was wronged ("those who were expelled from their homes...") and then expands the reasoning to a cosmic principle: without this check of "pushing back," all religion would be destroyed.

"Big Idea" Refined ⚔️

"Fighting is a Defensive Right, Activated by Aggression and Rooted in Divine Justice."

This verse establishes the Islamic principle of Jus ad Bellum (the right to wage war). It teaches that war is not a moral good but a legal and ethical concession in the face of intolerable injustice. The agency to fight is granted, but it is circumscribed by a defensive causality:

• Trigger: Being the target of armed aggression (يُقَاتَلُونَ).

• Cause: Having suffered concrete wrongs (ظُلِمُوا).

• Nature: A permitted response (أُذِنَ), not an open-ended command.

This was, as several narrations in Al-Tabari state, the first verse of war. It set the foundational, defensive tone for all that would follow, creating a world of moral and legal difference between fighting because you are being fought, and fighting because you want to fight.

Verse 40: The Cosmic Justification & Universal Purpose - An Expansive Analysis

الَّذِينَ أُخْرِجُوا مِن دِيَارِهِم بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ إِلَّا أَن يَقُولُوا رَبُّنَا اللَّهُ ۗ وَلَوْلَا دَفْعُ اللَّهِ النَّاسَ بَعْضَهُم بِبَعْضٍ لَّهُدِّمَتْ صَوَامِعُ وَبِيَعٌ وَصَلَوَاتٌ وَمَسَاجِدُ يُذْكَرُ فِيهَا اسْمُ اللَّهِ كَثِيرًا ۗ وَلَيَنصُرَنَّ اللَّهُ مَن يَنصُرُهُ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَقَوِيٌّ عَزِيزٌ (40)

Linguistic & Conceptual Deep Dive 🎯

This verse performs a breathtaking shift, moving from the specific historical plight of the Muslims to a universal cosmic principle that justifies defensive warfare as a divine mercy for all of humanity.

Segment	Linguistic & Exegetical Analysis (Based on Al-Tabari)	The Theological & Ethical "Amazingness" ✨
الَّذِينَ أُخْرِجُوا مِن دِيَارِهِم بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ إِلَّا أَن يَقُولُوا رَبُّنَا اللَّهُ ("Those who were driven from their homes unjustly, for no reason other than they said, 'Our Lord is Allah.'")	Al-Tabari is unequivocal: this refers directly to "the believers whom the pagan Quraysh expelled from Mecca." The "wrong" (بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ) was that the Muslims were on the side of Truth (الحق), while their oppressors were on falsehood (الباطل). The إِلَّا أَن (illā an) construction highlights that their "crime" was purely theological—their monotheistic declaration.	🎯 From Specific to Universal: This clause roots the entire cosmic argument that follows in a concrete, historical injustice. It is not an abstract theory of war; it is a divine response to a real, lived experience of religious persecution. This grounds Islamic ethics in reality.
وَلَوْلَا دَفْعُ اللَّهِ النَّاسَ بَعْضَهُم بِبَعْضٍ ("And if it were not for Allah's repelling some people by means of others...")	This is the CENTRAL CONCEPT. Al-Tabari synthesizes multiple interpretations of دَفْع (daf'): • The Military Interpretation: "Repelling the polytheists by means of the Muslims." (Ibn Juraij) • The Societal Interpretation: "Repelling oppression through systems of justice, testimony, and governance." (Mujahid) • The Historical Interpretation: "Repelling future tyranny by the sacrifices of the first Muslims." (Narrations from Ali) Al-Tabari concludes that the verse encompasses all these meanings. It is a universal divine law.	✨ The Divine Check and Balance: This is the verse's revolutionary core. It posits that God's method of preserving moral order on Earth is not by miraculous intervention to stop all conflict, but by sanctioning and guiding the human impulse to resist tyranny. War, in this specific, defensive context, is transformed from a mere human activity into a divinely-ordained mechanism for preserving justice. It is a "tragic necessity" woven into the fabric of creation.
لَّهُدِّمَتْ صَوَامِعُ وَبِيَعٌ وَصَلَوَاتٌ وَمَسَاجِدُ يُذْكَرُ فِيهَا اسْمُ اللَّهِ كَثِيرًا ("...then surely would have been destroyed monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques in which the name of Allah is much mentioned.")	Al-Tabari meticulously documents that these terms encompass every major house of worship known to 7th-century Arabia: • صَوَامِع (Sawami'): Monasteries of Christian monks. • بِيَع (Biya'): Churches of the Christians. • صَلَوَات (Salawat): Synagogues of the Jews (from Aramaic). • مَسَاجِد (Masajid): Mosques of the Muslims. The verb لَّهُدِّمَتْ (lahuddimat) is the intensive form, implying repeated, systematic destruction.	🎯 The Goal is Universal Religious Freedom: This is arguably one of the most profound statements of religious pluralism in any scripture. The ultimate purpose of the "permission to fight" granted to the Muslims is not the establishment of an Islamic theocracy that destroys other faiths, but the very opposite. It is to create a world where all faiths—including Christianity, Judaism, and others—can practice freely without fear of annihilation. The defense of the Muslim community is framed as a service to global religious freedom.
وَلَيَنصُرَنَّ اللَّهُ مَن يَنصُرُهُ ("And Allah will surely support those who support Him.")	Al-Tabari explains this as a divine covenant: "Allah will surely help those who fight in His cause... and the servant's 'support' of Allah is his Jihad in His cause so that His word be supreme." This creates a symbiotic relationship: God's help is contingent upon human effort in the cause of justice.	✨ The Covenant of Co-operation: This is a radical theology of agency. God is Al-Qawiyy (The Strong), Al-Aziz (The Mighty), yet He chooses to need the human being to be His agent of justice on Earth. It elevates the defensive struggle from a mere survival tactic to an act of worship and partnership with the Divine.
إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَقَوِيٌّ عَزِيزٌ ("Indeed, Allah is Powerful and Exalted in Might.")	This closing attribute serves as the ultimate foundation. God's power (قَوِيّ) is the source of the believers' strength, and His might (عَزِيز) guarantees that the justice they fight for will ultimately prevail.	🎯 The Ultimate Assurance: This is the bookend to Verse 38. It reminds the believers that the entire system of "repelling" rests on God's omnipotence. It is a call to courage, resilience, and absolute trust (tawakkul) even in the face of overwhelming odds.

Thematic Role & Flow ➡️

This verse is the COSMIC JUSTIFICATION that universalizes the specific permission of Verse 39.

• Verse 39 (The Law): "You may fight back because you are being attacked."

• ➡️ Verse 40 (The Why): "And here is the profound, universal reason why such a permission exists in the divine plan: to prevent the total annihilation of all faith and justice on Earth."

It answers the potential philosophical question: "Why would a merciful God permit war?" The answer: To prevent a far greater evil—the global triumph of unchecked tyranny that would eradicate all religion. The permission for the Muslims to fight is framed as their specific role in upholding this universal, divine law.

Flow to Verse 41: Having established the "why" of the struggle (to preserve places of worship), Verse 41 now describes the "what for?"—the ultimate goal of the community once it is established: to build a righteous society based on prayer, charity, and enjoining good.

The "Big Idea" Refined: A Masterpiece of Theological Ethics 🌍

"Divinely Sanctioned Defensive War is a Cosmic Safeguard to Preserve Global Religious Freedom and Prevent the Total Annihilation of Justice."

This verse is amazing because it:

1. Moralizes Warfare: It removes war from the realm of tribal vendetta or imperial ambition and places it squarely within a framework of altruistic defense—defense of one's own faith as a means of defending the very principle of faith for everyone.

2. Establishes a Pluralistic Purpose: In a 7th-century context, it is staggering that the preservation of Christian monasteries and Jewish synagogues is given as the primary reason for permitting Muslims to take up arms. This is a powerful, inherent theology of religious co-existence.

3. Presents a Theodicy of Conflict: It provides a profound answer to the problem of evil and violence, explaining that God allows a limited, ethical conflict (دَفْع) to prevent a far greater, absolute conflict and oppression.

4. Creates a Covenant of Justice: It forges a powerful link between human action and divine support, making believers active participants in the maintenance of cosmic moral balance.

In essence, Verse 40 transforms the "permission to fight" from a simple act of self-preservation into a sacred, cosmic responsibility. It is not a verse of conquest, but a verse of protection for the entire tapestry of human devotion to God.

Verse 41: The Ultimate Goal & Societal Vision - An Expanded Analysis

الَّذِينَ إِن مَّكَّنَّاهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ أَقَامُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَآتَوُا الزَّكَاةَ وَأَمَرُوا بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَنَهَوْا عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ ۗ وَلِلَّهِ عَاقِبَةُ الْأُمُورِ (41)

Linguistic & Conceptual Deep Dive 🎯

This verse is the powerful conclusion to the entire argument, shifting the focus from the means of survival to the ultimate ends of existence. It answers the critical question: "What happens after you win?"

Segment	Linguistic & Exegetical Analysis (Based on Al-Tabari)	The Teleological "Big Idea" 🏛️
الَّذِينَ إِن مَّكَّنَّاهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ ("Those who, if We establish them in the land...")	Al-Tabari is clear: this refers directly to "the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh)." The verb مَكَّنَّا (mak-kannā) comes from the root *m-k-n*, meaning "to establish," "to give a firm footing," "to grant authority and stability." It implies more than just military victory; it signifies the establishment of a sovereign, political entity with the capacity to govern.	🎯 The Prerequisite: Political Authority. The entire ethical project that follows is contingent upon achieving a minimum level of political stability and security (تمكين). The "permission to fight" from Verse 39 is the necessary means to achieve this condition of being "established in the land," without which a just society cannot be built.
أَقَامُوا الصَّلَاةَ ("...they establish the Prayer...")	To "establish" prayer (iqāmat as-ṣalāh) is a profound concept. It means to perform it completely, with its full conditions, pillars, and spirit, both as individuals and as a community. It signifies the vertical restoration of the God-humanity relationship.	✨ 1. The Spiritual Core (Vertical Axis): This is the foundation. The first duty of the empowered community is not to celebrate its power, but to institutionalize the worship of God. It is a constant reminder that political power is a trust from God, and the ultimate sovereignty belongs to Him alone.
وَآتَوُا الزَّكَاةَ ("...and give the Zakat...")	Zakat is not mere "charity"; it is a mandatory, systematized wealth tax for the purification of one's soul and wealth and the redistribution of resources to the poor and needy. It is the economic manifestation of faith.	✨ 2. The Economic Justice (Horizontal Axis): The second duty is to establish economic justice. A community that prays together must also ensure that its members are free from destitution. This prevents the new state from becoming an oppressive regime that benefits only the powerful.
وَأَمَرُوا بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَنَهَوْا عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ ("...and enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong.")	Al-Tabari, quoting Abu Al-`Aliyah, defines this specifically in the early context: • Al-Ma'ruf (The Recognized Good): "They invited to the sincere devotion of God alone, without partners." • Al-Munkar (The Recognized Evil): "They forbade the worship of idols and the worship of Satan." This is the social and moral mandate of the community.	✨ 3. The Social & Moral Mandate (Societal Axis): This is the community's mission to actively cultivate a moral public sphere. It is not enough to be personally pious; the community must be a collective force for good, actively promoting virtue and resisting vice in a gentle and wise manner. This is the operationalization of the "cosmic balance" from Verse 40.
وَلِلَّهِ عَاقِبَةُ الْأُمُورِ ("...and to Allah belongs the outcome of all matters.")	This is the ultimate closure. العاقبة (Al-ʿĀqibah) means the final result, the ultimate consequence. It is a powerful reminder that the success of this entire project—from the defensive struggle to the building of a just society—is ultimately in God's hands and will be judged by Him in the Hereafter.	🎯 The Final Accountability: This clause prevents arrogance and triumphalism. It reminds the believers that even after achieving political power and building a righteous society, they are not the ultimate masters of their destiny. The final judgment on their success or failure belongs to God alone.

Thematic Role & Flow ➡️

This verse is the TELEOLOGICAL CONCLUSION—it defines the ultimate purpose (telos) for which everything before it was revealed.

• Verses 38-40 (The "Why" and "How"): God defends the believers → permits them to fight back defensively → because this "repelling" is a cosmic law to preserve religious freedom for all.

• ➡️ Verse 41 (The "What For?"): "And the reason We have established you through this struggle is SO THAT you can now build a society that fulfills the purpose of your creation: to worship God, establish justice, and be a force for good in the world."

It masterfully reframes the entire preceding discussion of conflict. War is not the goal; it is a temporary, necessary, and heavily regulated means to achieve the true goal: the establishment of a moral community. The sequence of the four pillars is a deliberate blueprint for building that community from the ground up: first, spiritual connection with God; second, economic justice among people; third, a social order that actively promotes goodness.

The "Big Idea" Refined: The Entire Point of the Struggle 🕋

"The ultimate purpose of political empowerment, achieved through divinely-sanctioned self-defense, is to establish a sovereign moral community whose sole raison d'être is worship, economic justice, and the active promotion of good in the world."

This verse is the masterstroke that completes the theological framework. It reveals that:

1. The Jihad has a Final, Constructive Endpoint: The struggle does not perpetuate itself. It aims at its own cessation in favor of a peaceful, worship-oriented society.

2. Power is a Tool, Not a Trophy: Political authority (تمكين) is not an end in itself to be enjoyed. It is a tool and a test, given by God for the specific purpose of establishing His worship and justice.

3. The Blueprint for an Islamic State: This is the quintessential description of the Islamic polity's purpose. It is not defined by borders or military might, but by its commitment to these four pillars: Prayer, Zakat, Enjoining Good, Forbidding Evil.

4. A Universal Standard: This provides a timeless criterion for success. A Muslim community's health is not measured by the battles it has won, but by the prayer it establishes, the poverty it eradicates, and the morality it cultivates.

In essence, Verse 41 answers "What happens once the Muslims win?" The answer is: They get to work building the kind of society God wants—one rooted in piety, justice, and active virtue. The war was never for dominion; it was for the divine space to fulfill humanity's highest potential.

The Divine Blueprint: The "Golden Circle" of Islamic Jus ad Bellum 🔄

The sequence of Qur'an 22:38-41 is not a random collection of verses. It is a meticulously structured divine communication that follows a powerful, logical framework—often called the "Golden Circle"—used to inspire profound commitment and clarity. It moves from the core purpose outward to the final outcome.

Here is the expanded breakdown of that structure:

1. WHY? 🧭 (The Core Belief & Cosmic Cause)

(Verses 38 & 40)

This is the foundational, non-negotiable purpose that justifies everything that follows. It answers the ultimate question: Why would a Merciful God ever permit violence?

• Divine Defense (v.38): The struggle begins with God’s action, not man’s. "Indeed, Allah defends those who have believed." This establishes that the entire endeavor is under divine sovereignty and is a manifestation of God's justice. It is a response to a cosmic imbalance where oppression exists.

• Preservation of Universal Religious Freedom (v.40): This is the stunning, universal justification. The "permission to fight" is granted as a necessary mechanism within God's creation to preserve the very possibility of faith on Earth. The verse states that without this principle of "repelling" (دَفْع), all places of worship—monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques—would be destroyed.

  • 🎯 The "Why" is not conquest, but protection. It is a cosmic check and balance against totalitarian evil. The goal is to create a world where all people can worship God freely, not a world where only one faith exists.

➡️ CORE BELIEF: God’s cause is the defense of the oppressed and the preservation of religious freedom as a universal human right. War is a tragic necessity to prevent a greater evil—the complete annihilation of justice and faith.

2. HOW? ⚖️ (The Method & Legal Mechanism)

(Verse 39)

Once the "Why" is established, the "How" defines the strict, limited, and ethical means by which this cosmic purpose is to be achieved. It prevents the noble "Why" from being corrupted by human passion.

• A Permission, Not a Command (أُذِنَ): The language is one of concession. Fighting is not an intrinsic good; it is a legal relief granted due to dire circumstances.

• Strictly Defensive & Reactive (يُقَاتَلُونَ): The use of the passive voice is legally precise. Permission is only for those who are being fought. It is not for those who seek fight. This locks the ruling into a reactive posture.

• Causality of Injustice (بِأَنَّهُمْ ظُلِمُوا): The sole trigger is having been "wronged." This is the casus belli—the just cause that activates the permission. The "wrong" is defined in Verse 40 as expulsion from homes and persecution for belief.

➡️ THE METHOD: A strictly defensive, legally-constrained, and ethically-caused military response. It is a right that is activated by aggression, not a right that is inherent.

3. WHAT? 🏛️ (The Ultimate Goal & Final Outcome)

(Verse 41)

The "What" describes the tangible result and the ultimate objective. This is what the "Why" and "How" are designed to build. It ensures that the means are never confused with the ends.

• From Security to Society (إِن مَّكَّنَّاهُمْ فِي الْأَرْض): The "What" begins only after the community is established securely in the land. The military struggle is a means to this end, not the end itself.

• The Four Pillars of the Moral Community: The entire purpose of political empowerment is to:

  1. أَقَامُوا الصَّلَاةَ (Establish Prayer): Institutionalize the worship of God—the spiritual core.

  2. آتَوُا الزَّكَاةَ (Give Zakat): Establish economic justice and purify wealth—the social core.

  3. أَمَرُوا بِالْمَعْرُوفِ (Enjoin Good): Actively promote virtue in society.

  4. نَهَوْا عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ (Forbid Evil): Actively resist vice in society.

• Final Accountability (وَلِلَّهِ عَاقِبَةُ الْأُمُورِ): The entire project is subject to God's final judgment, preventing arrogance and moral drift.

➡️ THE GOAL: The establishment of a sovereign, moral community whose reason for existence is worship, social justice, and the active cultivation of good. The "What" is a society, not an empire.

Conclusion: The Complete Theological Architecture

This "Golden Circle" powerfully argues that the Islamic "permission to fight" is the very antithesis of unprovoked aggression.

• It is not a standalone command but is embedded within a holistic system.

• It begins and ends with God's purpose and judgment.

• It is causally linked to injustice.

• It is legally constrained by defensive parameters.

• It is teleologically directed toward building a peaceful, just, and worship-oriented society.

This structure transforms warfare from a tool of political expansion into a limited, ethical instrument within a divine plan whose ultimate goal is universal mercy, justice, and the freedom to worship God. The fight is permitted so that prayer may be established.

Part 2: The Prophetic Implementation – Rules of Engagement in a Lawless Era

The divine "permission to fight" in the Qur'an was not left as an abstract principle. It was immediately operationalized by the Prophet Muhammad through a set of concrete, revolutionary ethical rules that stood in stark contrast to the brutal norms of 7th-century warfare. While the surrounding empires—the Romans (Byzantines) and Sassanid Persians—engaged in total war characterized by systematic devastation, massacre, and enslavement, the Prophet instituted a code of conduct that humanized conflict. This code did not eliminate the horrors of war, but it imposed a moral framework so radical for its time that it transformed warfare from an instrument of annihilation into a disciplined, last-resort action with strict humanitarian limits.

2.1. A Comparative Glance: The 7th-Century World – A Theater of Atrocity

To understand the revolutionary nature of the Islamic code, we must first survey the brutal landscape of late antique warfare. Leif Inge Ree Petersen's Siege Warfare and Military Organization provides a chillingly detailed autopsy of this era, revealing a military environment where atrocity was not an aberration but a standard tool of statecraft. The "Vegetian" model of warfare, as Petersen outlines, was built on a foundation of calculated terror and suffering.

"…note that there are two types of siege… one… attacks the besieged by means of unremitting assaults… the other… prevents those under blockade from getting water, or hopes for a surrender through famine since he has stopped all supply-lines. By this strategy he himself remains at leisure and safe, while he wears down the enemy." (Petersen, quoting Vegetius)

This was the grim reality against which the Prophetic directives emerged. The following table contrasts the established norms of the era with the revolutionary Islamic code.

Warfare Aspect 🔥	Roman & Persian Norms (The "Standard" of the Era)	Islamic Prophetic Norms (The Revolutionary Code) 🛡️
🎯 Objective & Strategy	"Vegetian" Siege & Blockade: War aimed at breaking the enemy's will through systematic starvation and terror. Blockades could last years, deliberately causing famine. Petersen details how "the purpose of a blockade was to deprive the defenders of supplies," often beginning with "ravaging the surrounding countryside" which "destroyed the economic basis of a city." • Example: At Amida (504f), the Persian garrison resorted to cannibalism: "the Persian garrison abandoned their Roman concubines to their fate (the women reportedly ambushed the few emaciated men left in the city and ate them)." At Perugia (545ff), a multi-year blockade preceded a final, brutal storm.	Limited, Defensive Objective: The goal was to end persecution and establish security, not annihilation. The Qur'anic justification for fighting was to prevent the destruction of faith and society (22:40). Prolonged sieges causing mass civilian starvation were contrary to the ethos of swift, just resolution and the preservation of life.
💀 Treatment of Combatants & Non-Combatants	Massacre & Enslavement were Standard Practice. Petersen's chapter on the "Consequences of Fall" is a catalog of horrors: "In most cases, a storm ended in a combination of atrocities." • Massacre: At Amida (502f), "survivors were taken out and executed by various means after the fighting was over." At Milan (538), the Ostrogoths "massacred the men… while the women were distributed to the Burgundians." • Rape: Considered a conqueror's prerogative. Petersen notes that "rape was accepted as the conqueror’s prerogative" and it is often "euphemistically framed as the 'distribution' of captives." Totila's ban at Naples (542f) was noted specifically because it was so unusual. • Captivity: Huge population transfers were common. The Persians took 273,000 captives from Apamea (573), and at Antioch (540), the population was deported en masse.	Explicit Protection of Civilians: The Prophet's direct command: "Do not kill women, children, the aged, or the monastic." • No Massacre: A stark departure from the norm. The focus was on combatants, not the extermination of populations. • No Rape: This prohibition, embedded in the respect for prisoners, was a monumental ethical leap, directly challenging a universal practice of the time. • Regulated Captivity: While prisoners were taken, their ethical treatment, the encouragement of freeing them, and the rules governing their rights marked a significant humanitarian advance.
😱 Psychological Warfare & Morale	Deliberate Use of Terror: Petersen describes a "Cultural Topography" of warfare dominated by fear. • Torture & Mutilation: At Amida (503f), a captured Persian officer was impaled in sight of the walls. • Desecration: At Thessalonica (615), Roman defenders "went out and beheaded [Slavs], placing their heads on the walls." • Human Shields: At Noviodunum (437), "the children from the population were used as human shields." Petersen also describes the "irrational fear" that gripped cities like Constantinople, where citizens panicked at the mere approach of an enemy.	Moral Restraint & Prohibition of Cruelty: The Prophet forbade mutilation, torture, and the killing of animals or destruction of crops unnecessarily. The concept of Ihsan (excellence, goodness) was to be maintained even in warfare. The objective was to win a conflict with discipline, not to terrorize a population into submission through savagery.
🏚️ Destruction of Infrastructure	"Scorched Earth" & Cultural Destruction: • Economic Warfare: Petersen explains that "strategic raiding" was used "to destroy the enemy’s ability to perform military operations by hitting at his supplies and infrastructure." This was a deliberate policy of economic annihilation. • Religious Sites: While sometimes spared, churches and monasteries were often looted or destroyed, as seen in the Persian sack of Jerusalem (614), which involved a massacre and the destruction of churches.	Preservation of Civilian Life & Worship: The Qur'anic justification for war itself was to prevent the destruction of "monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques" (22:40). This theology directly translated into practice, ordering the protection of places of worship, homes, and civilian infrastructure. The goal was to preserve society, not erase it.
⚖️ Post-Victory Settlement	Brutal Pacification or Total Abandonment: Conquest often meant massacre, enslavement, deportation, and the razing of city walls to prevent future rebellion (e.g., Emesa, 745). Petersen notes that Persian policies, even when initially peaceful, could quickly turn brutal, as at Jerusalem (614), where a local revolt led to a massacre of tens of thousands.	Integration & Pacts: The objective was to bring people into a just political order, not to erase them. Cities that surrendered were often given terms of peace (Sulh or Dhimmi pacts), allowing them to retain their religion, property, and laws in return for loyalty and a tax. This system, while establishing Muslim political supremacy, provided a framework for coexistence and stability that was often preferable to the destructive alternatives.

The Contrast in Practice ➡️

Petersen’s work objectively demonstrates that the 7th-century world was a "Theater of Atrocity" 🎭. The standard practices of the era were not occasional war crimes; they were the central engine of warfare:

• Starvation as Policy 🍞➡️💀

• Massacre as Custom ⚔️➡️🧍‍♂️

• Rape as Prerogative 🚻➡️😭

• Terror as Tactic 🏚️➡️😨

Against this grim backdrop, the Prophetic directives were nothing short of revolutionary. They were not a mild reform; they were a fundamental rejection of the prevailing ethos. The Islamic code introduced a concept of proportionality and distinction between combatant and non-combatant that was systematically absent from contemporary Roman, Persian, and Germanic military doctrine.

Petersen himself, analyzing the broader context, makes a crucial observation about the evolution of warfare in this period. After detailing the standard brutal practices, he notes a shift in rhetoric connected to the rise of Islam:

"This willingness to die in battle in return for heavenly rewards is a well known feature of early jihad theology."

While he connects this to a broader late antique trend, the Islamic implementation was unique. It channeled this powerful motivation not into a frenzy of destruction, but into a disciplined struggle (Jihad) bound by a strict, divine ethical code. The goal was not to terrorize the world into submission, but to create the conditions for a just society, as commanded in Qur'an 22:41.

Conclusion: A Seismic Shift in the Moral History of Warfare

Petersen’s work proves that atrocity was the norm in 7th-century warfare. In this context, the early Islamic conquests were inevitably marked by violence—as all wars in human history have been. Armies are composed of fallible humans, and the fog of war obscures judgment.

However, the critical, world-historical difference lies not in the flawless execution, but in the foundational legal and ethical framework.

• The Romans, Persians, and others operated with a military ethos that permitted and even encouraged total war. Their codes contained pragmatic advice, but no overarching divine prohibition against the slaughter of civilians or the use of starvation as a primary weapon.

• The Muslims, by contrast, operated under a divine mandate that explicitly forbade these very practices. The Qur'anic "permission to fight" was shackled at its inception with chains of restraint, mercy, and a higher purpose.

This was a seismic shift. For the first time on such a scale, a major military power was attempting to wage war not on the principle of "might makes right," but on the revolutionary principle of "right constrains might." The ultimate goal, as Verse 41 stated, was never mere domination, but the establishment of a righteous society ("to establish prayer, give charity, enjoin good, and forbid evil"). This re-framing of war from a tool of conquest to a tragic necessity for establishing justice represents one of the most significant moral innovations in the history of armed conflict.

2.2. Beyond the Verse: The Sunnah's Ethical Framework – A Revolution Within the Raid

The divine "permission" in the Qur'an was not a void to be filled by human whim. It was immediately and rigorously defined by the Prophet Muhammad's own directives to his troops. These were not abstract ideals or trivial footnotes; they constituted the core of Islamic jus in bello (the law governing conduct during war), creating a revolutionary ethical framework within the familiar structure of 7th-century Arabian warfare.

The Commander's Directives: A Code of Conduct

When the Prophet (pbuh) dispatched his commanders, his final instructions were a masterclass in ethical warfare. The following table synthesizes the core prohibitions from multiple authentic narrations (ahadith), presenting them as a unified military code.

The Prophetic Prohibition 🚫	Direct Quote from the Hadith	The Ethical Principle & Modern Jus in Bello Equivalent ⚖️
1. Protection of Non-Combatants	"Do not kill a weak, aged person, a child, a [young] child, or a woman." (Sunan Abi Dawud) "Do not kill children or the people of the monasteries (Ashab al-Sawami')." (Musnad Ahmad)	Principle of Distinction: This is the most fundamental rule. It clearly distinguishes between combatants and non-combatants, granting immunity to civilians, religious figures, and all those not engaged in hostilities.
2. Prohibition of Treachery & Perfidy	"Do not be treacherous (la taghduru)." (Sahih Muslim)	Principle of Good Faith: This forbids breaking treaties, violating truces, or using deceptive promises of safety to lure and then attack an enemy. It upholds the sanctity of agreements.
3. Prohibition of Theft & Pillage	"Do not misappropriate booty (la taghullu)." (Sahih Muslim) "Do not plunder (la tanhabu)." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Sunan Ibn Majah)	Principle of Collective Ownership & Order: This prevents looting and individual profiteering. Booty was to be collected and distributed centrally and justly. The Prophet famously overturned pots of meat his troops had prepared from "plundered" livestock, declaring, "Indeed, plunder is not lawful."
4. Prohibition of Mutilation & Cruelty	"Do not mutilate (la tumaththilu)." (Sahih Muslim)	Principle of Humanity & Dignity: This forbids disfiguring the dead or torturing the living, a common practice in pre-Islamic and contemporary warfare to terrorize foes. It insists on respecting the human body, even in death.
5. Mandate of General Good Conduct	"...and set your affairs in order and be good (wa ahsinu), for indeed Allah loves those who are good (al-Muhsinin)." (Sunan Abi Dawud)	Principle of Ihsan (Excellence): This is the overarching spirit. It commands Muslims to not merely avoid evil, but to actively be good and excel in their moral conduct, even towards the enemy.

The Escalation Ladder: A Roadmap to Peace, Not Slaughter

Crucially, the Prophet’s doctrine was not just a list of "don'ts." It was a proactive "Escalation Ladder" designed to avoid bloodshed. As narrated in Sahih Muslim, he instructed his commanders:

1. ➡️ First, Invite to Islam. Offer the enemy a chance to embrace the faith and join the community as full members with equal rights and duties.

2. ➡️ If they refuse, Offer Relocation. Invite them to peacefully emigrate to the Muslim polity and live as protected citizens under its law, even if they keep their faith.

3. ➡️ If they refuse, Seek a Treaty. Ask them to pay the Jizyah (a protective tax) in return for Muslim defense and autonomy in their religious and internal affairs.

4. ➡️ Only then, as a last resort, is fighting permitted.

This sequence reveals that the ultimate objective was integration and peace, not annihilation or mere conquest. Fighting was the final step after all avenues for a peaceful resolution had been exhausted.

Part 3: The Campaigns in Context – Defense, Deterrence, and Polity-Building

To label the Prophet Muhammad's military campaigns as purely "offensive" is to impose a modern, state-centric concept of warfare onto a 7th-century tribal context where such a distinction was often meaningless. As Joel Hayward's research demonstrates, the raids (ghazawat and saraya) were not acts of random banditry but a complex instrument of statecraft, survival, and communication. They were the essential language of power in a stateless Arabia, designed to secure a fledgling community against annihilation, project its strength to potential allies and enemies, and fund its existence in a landscape devoid of other economic models. When viewed through the lens of the Prophet's own stringent ethical code—preserved in the hadith—a clear picture emerges: a revolutionary form of warfare where the pursuit of political and economic objectives was rigidly constrained by a divine mandate of mercy and justice.

3.1. The "Offensive" Misnomer: Re-reading the Ghazawat and Saraya

Joel Hayward's analysis reframes the narrative around the Prophet's raids, moving us away from anachronistic moral judgments and into the practical realities of 7th-century Arabia.

Aspect	Hayward's Analysis & Historical Context	Reconciliation with Prophetic War Doctrine 🛡️
🔄 The Pre-Badr Raids	Targeted Operations, Not Random Banditry: Hayward notes that before Badr, raids were "almost exclusively against the Quraysh." The Quraysh were not a neutral party; they were the active aggressors who had driven the Muslims from Mecca, confiscated their property, and continued to threaten the Medinan community's existence. These raids were targeted economic and intelligence operations against this specific, ongoing threat. Intercepting Qurayshi caravans was a strategic move to weaken their economy and demonstrate that the Muslims were a viable political and military force.	This aligns perfectly with the defensive casus belli established in Qur'an 22:39—"permission is given to those who are being fought because they were wronged." The raids were a tangible response to the Quraysh's active persecution. The doctrine from the hadith, "Fight in the way of God those who fight you", provides the ethical framework for this targeted retaliation.
💰 The "Booty" Question	The Essential Economic Reality: Hayward is unequivocal: "Booty remained central." In a stateless society with no taxation system, raiding was the primary mechanism for wealth redistribution and war finance. It was "a recognized, understood and acceptable Arabian way of acquiring the booty that individuals undoubtedly craved and which, through its clever and courageous acquisition, bestowed prestige." Every contemporary power and tribe operated this way. A Tool of Statecraft: Booty was not mere greed. It was essential to: • Reward followers in a prestige-based society. • Weaken the enemy's economy. • Secure alliances, as with the Banū Mudlij and Banū Ḍamra after a raid impressed them. The Limits of "Restitution": Hayward points out that the common apologetic—that booty was merely restorative for the exiled Muhajirun—"falls apart post-Badr." After the victory of Badr, the community's wealth was largely restored, and the Ansar (Medinan helpers who had not been wronged) began participating in raids, yet the practice continued for years.	The Prophetic doctrine strictly regulated this reality to prevent abuse. The hadiths explicitly condemn unlawful seizure: • "Do not be guilty of treachery (لا تَغْدِرُوا)." • "Do not steal from the booty (لا تَغُلُّوا)." • "Do not engage in an-nahb (plunder/rapine) (عَنِ النَّهْبَةِ)." Booty was permissible only when taken from combatants after a legitimate conflict and was to be pooled and distributed fairly ("consolidate your spoils"), not looted indiscriminately. This transformed a tribal custom into a regulated, communal economic system.
🎯 Post-Badr Expansion of Targets	Polity-Building and Deterrence: After Badr, the raids expanded beyond the Quraysh to include Bedouin tribes throughout the Hijaz. Hayward explains these were largely "small-scale, casualty-light saraya" that served as "shows of strength designed not only to take booty ... but also to show Bedouin and other allies of the Quraysh that the Muslims were a force to be reckoned with." The goal was to break the Quraysh's network of alliances and compel other tribes to side with Medina or, at a minimum, remain neutral.	This expansion is governed by the graduated war doctrine found in the hadith of Buraydah. Before fighting, the enemy must be offered three options, in sequence: 1. ➡️ Accept Islam. 2. ➡️ If they refuse, pay the Jizyah (tribute) and live under Muslim protection. 3. ➡️ "If they refuse, then seek God's help and fight them." This establishes that fighting is a last resort, only permissible after offers of peace and submission have been rejected. The raids were the enforcement mechanism of this political ultimatum.

3.2. The Bedouin "Language of Power" 🗣️➡️💪

Hayward’s work brilliantly illuminates the cultural context that explains why raiding was the chosen method.

• A State of Continuous War: In 7th-century Arabia, "a general state of war was commonly understood to exist among the tribes." Raiding was not an event that started a war; it was an ordinary activity within a perpetual state of competition.

• The "Sport" of Esteem: Raiding was a "major occupation of the tribesmen," a ritualized activity where men developed and demonstrated coveted masculine virtues: courage, cunning, endurance, and generosity. As Hayward quotes from ethnographers, it was a domain for "the demonstration of valor and fortitude."

• A Communicative Act: For Muhammad, building a new polity (the Ummah), raids were the primary "language" to communicate with other tribes. To be seen as strong, viable, and worthy of respect and alliance, his community had to speak this language fluently. The raids were a form of political rhetoric. A successful raid communicated: "We are powerful, organized, and generous to our friends. Ally with us, or at least do not oppose us."

The Synthesis: Reconciling Raids with the Prophetic War Doctrine ⚖️

The Prophet's conduct perfectly synthesizes the necessity of the raid-as-institution with the ethics of his revolutionary war doctrine. The hadiths provide the unwavering ethical framework within which all military action, including raids for booty, had to operate.

Prophetic Directive from Hadith 🎯	Practical Application in the Raids 🔍	Evidence from Hayward's Analysis
"Do not kill women, children, the aged, or the monastic (أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ)." "Do not kill a child, a woman, or an elderly person."	Explicit Protection of Non-Combatants. This was a radical departure from the norms of the era. The raids focused on capturing herds and engaging combatants.	Hayward confirms the "casualty-light" and "generally fairly bloodless" nature of the raids. The objective was booty and prestige, not annihilation.
"Do not cheat/steal from the booty (لا تَغُلُّوا)." "Do not plunder (لا تَغْلِلُوا)."	Regulated and Centralized Booty Distribution. All booty was pooled and distributed by the leader (the Prophet) according to divine rules (Khums), preventing the chaos of individual looting.	Hayward details how Muhammad was "responsible for the distribution of any captured booty," taking only his entitled one-fifth (Khums), which was then largely used for the community's welfare.
"Do not betray (لا تَغْدِرُوا)." "Do not be treacherous."	Honoring Agreements. The Prophet strictly upheld treaties. Alliances formed with tribes like the Banū Mudlij were honored, and violations were met with restitution.	Hayward notes the alliance with Banū Mudlij held fast, even when they were pressured to attack Muslim allies before the conquest of Mecca.
"Do not mutilate (لا تُمَثِّلُوا)."	Prohibition of Atrocity. This rule forbade the desecration of bodies, a common practice in pre-Islamic warfare to terrorize enemies.	The entire ethos of the raids, as described, was about cunning and courage, not savage brutality. The focus was on taking property, not inflicting terror through mutilation.
"Go forth in the name of God... and do good, for verily, God loves those who do good (أَحْسِنُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُحْسِنِينَ)."	The Overarching Principle of Ihsan (Excellence & Goodness). Even in the harsh reality of war, the standard was to act with moral excellence. This included providing for prisoners, as seen after the raid on Banū Al-Muṣṭaliq.	This principle undergirds all the specific rules, transforming warfare from a mere struggle for survival into an act of worship governed by mercy and justice.

Conclusion: A Coherent and Revolutionary Model

The Prophet Muhammad’s military campaigns were not a contradiction of his ethical rules but their ultimate test and application. He operated within the inescapable political and economic framework of his time—the raid—but he revolutionized it from within.

He took a customary practice defined by tribal honor and infused it with a divine ethics of universal mercy. The goal was not to reject the "language of power" but to speak it with a new, moral vocabulary. The raids were the means to achieve the defensive and political objectives justified by Qur'an 22:39, while the hadiths were the strict rules of engagement that ensured this power was wielded justly, creating a disciplined military force that stood in stark contrast to the brutal armies of the age. This synthesis allowed a vulnerable community to survive, thrive, and ultimately establish a political order whose ultimate goal, as per Qur'an 22:41, was not dominion, but the establishment of prayer, charity, and justice.

Part 4: The Statistical Reality – Quantifying a Defensive, Polity-Building Campaign

The historical and ethical analysis finds its ultimate, undeniable proof in the cold, hard numbers. The statistical record of the Prophet Muhammad's military operations, meticulously compiled by researchers like Dr. Mosa'b Hawarey, provides a quantitative lens that shatters the myth of an unprovoked, expansionist war and confirms our thesis of a defensive, communication-based, and ethically-constrained struggle.

The Big Picture: A Campaign of Strategic Communication, Not Conquest

Let's break down the nature of all 85 military operations.

Nature of Military Operations	Number	Percentage	Key Takeaway & Proof 🎯
All Operations	85	100%	The Total Scope
Purely Offensive 🚩	49	57.7%	The "Offensive" Misnomer in Context: While this seems high, this category must be understood through the Bedouin "Language of Power." As Joel Hayward established, in a stateless society where a "general state of war" was the default, these were not invasions but shows of force and political communication to secure alliances and deter enemies.
Offensive to Defend ⚔️➡️🛡️	21	24.7%	The Proactive Defense: This crucial category describes pre-emptive actions against gathering threats. This aligns perfectly with the strategic goal of protecting Medina from encirclement and annihilation by the Quraysh and their allies. It is the practical application of deterrence.
Defensive 🛡️	3	3.5%	The Reactive Defense: A small but critical number. This includes the Battles of Badr, Uhud, and the Trench—defensive battles forced upon the Muslims by invading Meccan armies. This proves the core claim of Qur'an 22:39: they were "those who are being fought."
Dawah (Invitation) 🕊️	4	4.7%	The Primacy of Peace: A significant number of missions were purely for peaceful invitation to Islam, demonstrating that force was never the first resort. This operationalizes the hadith's command to "first invite them to Islam."
Reconnaissance 🔍	2	2.4%	Intelligence-Driven Campaigns: Highlights a strategic, calculated approach, not reckless aggression.
Peacemaking & Deceptive Maneuver 🤝🎭	2	2.4%	Strategic Depth: Shows a sophisticated understanding of statecraft that went beyond mere combat.

➡️ THE STATISTICAL NARRATIVE: The story told by these numbers is not one of mindless aggression. It is the story of a vulnerable polity using a spectrum of tools—from peaceful diplomacy (Dawah) and intelligence gathering (Reconnaissance) to pre-emptive and proactive military actions (Offensive to Defend)—to survive and establish its legitimacy. The "offensive" raids were the loudest and most frequent tool in this box, used to speak the only language its adversaries understood.

The Timeline of Conflict: A Story of Survival and Consolidation

The distribution of military operations by year powerfully refutes the idea of a perpetual war of conquest.

Hijri Year vs. Number of Military Operations

Hijri Year	Key Historical Context	Number of Operations	What the Data Proves
1-2	Arrival in Medina; Foundation of State	12	The struggle begins immediately because the threat is immediate. The Quraysh did not accept the Hijrah peacefully.
3-5	Battles of Badr, Uhud, and the Trench	17	Peak of Existential Threat. These years see intense defensive and proactive campaigns as the Quraysh and their allies make concerted efforts to destroy the Muslim community in Medina.
6	Treaty of Hudaybiyyah (A Year of Peace)	17	A Paradox Explained. The high number during a peace treaty proves Hayward's point: raids continued as a tool of statecraft to project power and bring neutral tribes into the Islamic orbit, ensuring the Quraysh's isolation.
7-8	Conquest of Mecca; Consolidation of Power	31	The Culmination. This is the period of the conquest of Mecca (a bloodless, strategic victory) and the subsequent battles to defeat remaining hostile coalitions. This is the "polity-building" phase in action.
9-11	The Final Years; Widespread Acceptance	8	The Dramatic Decline. Once the Islamic polity was secure and its power uncontested, military operations plummeted. This is the clearest possible evidence that the goal was security and establishment, not endless conquest. The "Language of Power" had been successfully spoken, and the message was received.

📈 The Statistical Trajectory is Clear: A sharp rise in operations during years of existential threat, followed by a dramatic drop once security was achieved. This is the signature of a defensive, polity-building struggle, not an expansionist crusade.

The Prophetic Standard: Leading from the Front

Metric	Statistic	Significance
Operations Commanded by the Prophet	31 out of 85 (36.5%)	This is a staggering figure. It proves that the Prophet personally oversaw more than a third of all military actions. This ensured that his strict ethical code (from the hadiths) was implemented directly. He shared the risks, the hardships (the Jihad), and the responsibility, leading by example and guaranteeing that the revolution in military ethics was not just theoretical but practical and enforced.

Conclusion: The Statistics Seal the Argument

The numbers don't lie; they tell a coherent and powerful story that validates every part of our analysis:

1. ✅ The "Why" of Qur'an 22:39 is Proven: The consistent military activity, especially the purely defensive battles (3.5%) and offensive-to-defend operations (24.7%), quantitatively demonstrates a community under active and existential threat, justifying the divine permission to fight back.

2. ✅ The "How" of the Prophetic Code is Proven: The sheer number of bloodless raids and shows of force (categorized as "Offensive") aligns with the hadiths' prohibitions against killing non-combatants. The low casualty count in the historical record is a direct result of this ethical restraint.

3. ✅ The "What For" of Polity-Building is Proven: The timeline of operations—peaking during the struggle for survival and vanishing after victory—is the exact pattern of a community fighting for its right to exist and govern, not for territorial empire. The use of raids as a "Language of Power" is confirmed by their strategic use during the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah.

The statistical record is the final, irrefutable witness. It reveals the Prophet's military career as a masterfully orchestrated, ethically revolutionary, and ultimately successful campaign to transform a persecuted band of believers into a sovereign, just, and secure community—a moral community whose founding struggle was defined not by conquest, but by the disciplined and principled pursuit of peace.

Conclusion: Reclaiming the Narrative of a Just Struggle

The journey through the Qur'anic verses, the Prophetic traditions, the historical context, and the cold, hard statistics leads us to a single, inescapable conclusion: the Islamic "permission to fight" has been profoundly misunderstood and deliberately misrepresented.

Let us retrace the path of our discovery: 🔄

• ➡️ We began in the Qur'an (22:38-41), where we found not a cry for bloodshed, but a "Golden Circle" of divine logic: a defensive permission (HOW) rooted in God's defense of the oppressed (WHY) and directed toward the ultimate goal of building a moral society (WHAT). This was a theocentric doctrine of war, not an anthropocentric one.

• ➡️ We witnessed the Prophetic Implementation, a revolutionary code of ethics that stood as a beacon of mercy in the 7th-century "Theater of Atrocity." 🛡️ vs. 🔥 While empires used starvation, massacre, and rape as standard policy, the Prophet Muhammad commanded, "Do not kill women, children, the aged, or the monastic. Do not cheat. Do not mutilate." This was not a mild reform; it was a seismic shift in the moral history of warfare.

• ➡️ We re-contextualized the Campaigns, seeing the raids not as "offensive" in a modern sense, but as the essential "Language of Power" 🗣️ in a stateless, tribal Arabia. They were tools of deterrence, statecraft, and economic survival, rigidly constrained by the ethical framework that forbade treachery and plunder.

• ➡️ We let the Statistics speak, and they told a powerful story. The data revealed that the narrative of relentless expansion is a myth. The military struggle peaked precisely when the Muslim community faced existential siege and collapsed as soon as security was achieved. This is the profile of a defensive struggle for survival, not an imperial crusade.

The story of Qur'an 22:39 is the story of a verse of restraint, not aggression. It is the story of a divine concession, granting a persecuted community the right to defend itself within strictly defined ethical limits. It is the story of a Prophet who took this permission and built around it the world's first comprehensive doctrine of Just War, centered on the protection of human life and dignity, even in the midst of conflict.

To weaponize this history to justify modern terrorism or unprovoked aggression is not just an error—it is a betrayal of the Qur'an's spirit, the Prophet's example, and the entire classical legal tradition. The true legacy of this "permission to fight" is a timeless principle: that even in the necessary horror of war, justice, mercy, and the preservation of innocent life must reign supreme. This is the enduring, revolutionary message of Islam's birth in the crucible of late antiquity.

THE END. ✨

📚 Works Cited

-

Primary Sources

al-Balādhurī, Ahmad b. Yaḥyā. History of the Arab Invasions: The Conquest of the Lands (A New Translation of al-Balādhurī’s Futūḥ al-Buldān). Translated and with historical commentary by Hugh Kennedy, I.B. Tauris, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2022.

al-Baghawī, Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥusayn ibn Masʿūd. Maʿālim al-Tanzīl fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān (Tafsīr al-Baghawī). Ed. Muḥammad ʿAbd Allāh al-Nimr, ʿUthmān Jumʿah Ḍumayriyyah, and Sulaymān Muslim al-Ḥarash. 4th ed. Dār Ṭayyibah li-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzīʿ, 1417 AH / 1997 CE. 8 vols.

Al-Qurṭubī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Anṣārī. Al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qurʾān. Edited by Aḥmad al-Bardūnī and Ibrāhīm Aṭfīsh, 2nd ed., Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣrīyah, 1384 AH [1964 CE]. 20 vols. in 10.

al-Ṭabarī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān. Mecca: Dār al-Tarbiyah wa-l-Turāth, n.d. 24 vols.

al-Tabari, Muhammad ibn Jarir. Tarikh al-Tabari = Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk. Edited by Muhammad Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim, Dar al-Ma‘arif, Egypt, 1967. 

al-Ṭurṭūshī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn al-Walīd al-Fihrī. Sirāj al-Mulūk. Min Awāʾil al-Maṭbūʿāt al-ʿArabiyya, Miṣr, 1289 AH / 1872 CE.

Connolly, Serena, Simon Corcoran, Michael Crawford, John Noel Dillon, Dennis P. Kehoe, Noel Lenski, Thomas A. J. McGinn, Charles F. Pazdernik, and Benet Salway, editors. The Codex of Justinian: A New Annotated Translation, with Parallel Latin and Greek Text. Based on a translation by Justice Fred H. Blume, edited under the general editorship of Bruce W. Frier, with contributions by Timothy Kearley, Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Harrak, Amir, translator. The Chronicle of Zuqnin, Parts III and IV: A.D. 488–775. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1999.

Hoyland, Robert G., translator. Theophilus of Edessa’s Chronicle and the Circulation of Historical Knowledge in Late Antiquity and Early Islam. Liverpool University Press, 2011. Translated Texts for Historians, vol. 57.

Ibn Kathīr, Imād al-Dīn Abū al-Fidāʾ Ismāʿīl ibn ʿUmar al-Dimashqī. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Annotated by Muḥammad Ḥusayn Shams al-Dīn, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1st ed., 1419 AH / 1998 CE, 9 vols.

Mangō, Cyril, and Roger Scott, with the assistance of Geoffrey Greatrex. The Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor: Byzantine and Near Eastern History, AD 284–813. Clarendon Press, 1997.

Moosa, Matti, translator. The Syriac Chronicle of Michael Rabo (The Great): A Universal History from the Creation. Beth Antioch Press, 2014.

Palmer, Andrew. The Seventh Century in the West Syrian Chronicles. Liverpool University Press, 1993.

Penn, Michael Philip, translator and editor. When Christians First Met Muslims: A Sourcebook of the Earliest Syriac Writings on Islam. University of California Press, 2015.

Thomson, R. W., translator. The Armenian History Attributed to Sebeos. Translated with notes by R. W. Thomson, historical commentary by James Howard-Johnston, assistance from Tim Greenwood, Liverpool University Press, 1999.

Secondary Sources

Avni, Gideon. The Byzantine–Islamic Transition in Palestine: An Archaeological Approach. Oxford University Press, 2014.

Bcheiry, Iskandar. An Early Christian Reaction to Islam: Išū‘yahb III and the Muslim Arabs. Gorgias Press LLC, 2019.

Bessard, Fanny. Caliphs and Merchants: Cities and Economies of Power in the Near East (700–950). Oxford University Press, 2020.

Borrut, Antoine, and Fred M. Donner, editors. Christians and Others in the Umayyad State. The University of Chicago, Oriental Institute, 2016.

Cohen, Mark R. Under Crescent and Cross: The Jews in the Middle Ages. Princeton University Press, 1994.

Daryaee, Touraj. Sasanian Persia: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. I.B. Tauris, 2023.

Furman, Yulia, and Dmitry Cherkashin. “‘Superiority Is Due to Us, and the King Should Come from Among Us’: The Arab Conquests and Conflicts of the Early Umayyad Era in a 7th-Century Syriac Universal History of Yoḥannān bar Penkāyē.” Der Islam, vol. 101, no. 2, 2024, pp. 346–382. De Gruyter.

Greatrex, Geoffrey, and Samuel N.C. Lieu, editors. The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars, Part II AD 363–630: A Narrative Sourcebook. Routledge, 2002.

Harper, Kyle. The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire. Princeton University Press, 2017.

Hayward, Joel. The Leadership of Muhammad: A Historical Reconstruction. Claritas Books, 2021.

---. The Warrior Prophet: Muhammad and War. Claritas Books, 2022.

Howard-Johnston, James. The Last Great War of Antiquity. Oxford University Press, 2021. 

Hoyland, Robert G. Seeing Islam as Others Saw It, Gorgias Press LLC, 2019.

Hurvitz, Nimrod, Christian C. Sahner, Uriel Simonsohn, and Luke Yarbrough, editors. 

Conversion to Islam in the Premodern Age: A Sourcebook. University of California Press, 2020.

Kreiner, Jamie. Legions of Pigs in the Early Medieval West. Yale University Press, 2020

Levy-Rubin, Milka. Non-Muslims in the Early Islamic Empire: From Surrender to Coexistence. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Levy-Rubin, Milka. “Were the Jews Prohibited from Settling in Jerusalem? On the Authenticity of al-Ṭabarī’s Jerusalem Surrender Agreement.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam (JSAI), vol. 36, 2009.

Linder, Amnon, editor. The Jews in Roman Imperial Legislation. Wayne State University Press and The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1987.

Linder, Amnon, editor. The Jews in the Legal Sources of the Early Middle Ages. Wayne State University Press and The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1997.

Lindstedt, Ilkka. Muḥammad and His Followers in Context: The Religious Map of Late Antique Arabia. Brill, 2023.

Maas, Michael, editor. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Marsham, Andrew. The Umayyad Empire. Edinburgh University Press, 2024.

Matthee, Rudi. Angels Tapping at the Wine-Shop’s Door: A History of Alcohol in the Islamic World. C. Hurst & Co. (Publishers) Ltd., 2023.

Miller, David J. D., and Peter Sarris. The Novels of Justinian: A Complete Annotated English Translation. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Morony, Michael G. Iraq After the Muslim Conquest. Gorgias Press, 2005. (Facsimile reprint of the 1984 Princeton University Press edition.)

O’Donnell, J. J. The Ruin of the Roman Empire: A New History. Harper Perennial, 2009.

Payne, Richard E. A State of Mixture: Christians, Zoroastrians, and Iranian Political Culture in Late Antiquity. University of California Press, 2015.

Petersen, Leif Inge Ree. Siege Warfare and Military Organization in the Successor States (400–800 AD): Byzantium, the West and Islam. Brill, 2013.

Robinson, Chase F. "Neck-Sealing in Early Islam." Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, vol. 48, no. 3, 2005, pp. 401-41. 

Sahner, Christian C. Christian Martyrs under Islam: Religious Violence and the Making of the Muslim World. Princeton University Press, 2018.

Sarris, Peter. Justinian: Emperor, Soldier, Saint. Basic Books, 2023.

Sijpesteijn, Petra M. Shaping a Muslim State: The World of a Mid-Eighth-Century Egyptian Official. Oxford University Press, 2013.

Simonsohn, Uriel I. A Common Justice: The Legal Allegiances of Christians and Jews under Early Islam. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.

Simonsohn, Uriel. “Conversion, Exemption, and Manipulation: Social Benefits and Conversion to Islam in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages.” Medieval Worlds, no. 6, 2017, pp. 196–216

Weitz, Lev E. Between Christ and Caliph: Law, Marriage, and Christian Community in Early Islam. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.